My point is that any time you create an original work using someone else's characters, you've already met 3 of the 4 criteria above,
Nah, it's still not necessarily transformative. This link discusses the distinction. Also, notice the distinction between satire and parody.
But, the general legal consensus seems to be that character copyrights are enforceable
Do you have case references for this idea? Because if you did, then your post would actually be interesting.
As I've said before, if he's really this stand up guy, why did he run? IF he really had good and legal reasons to do what he did, take it to court and face the music.
Snowden seems like a stand-up guy, Assange seems like a moron and a jerk. In either case, focusing on the person distracts from what matters: the problems in the US government.
The main difference is that you're likely to do "Insert 1 in master, 5 in detail, 1 in master, 5 in detail", batching them in groups of 1 and N, when the correct way is to insert all the rows in master, then all the rows in details (batching in smaller groups if transaction size is a problem).
I'll try it out.
Yahoo was stagnating for years, so it's unclear what these people who were WFH were actually doing.
They were doing nothing. She checked the logs to make sure, people weren't logging into work.
I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"
