Comment Re:Other OS's (Score 1) 101
Not really, it would mean you would need to visually inspect the warnings to make sure there were no problems. If you were actually going to use it in a place where security was crucial
maybe we should think about stupid regulation versus smart regulation
YES thankyou for saying this, you are amazing. Everytime I hear someone engaging in an argument saying, "regulation is bad!" "no, regulation is good!" I hang my head in wonder at the stupidity involved. Couldn't it possibly be that there are some good regulations, and some bad regulations, and that the wise choice is to both oppose and favor regulations at the same time?
Says the guy commenting on the issue without knowing anything about the treatments objected to by other regions - objections just as "sincere" as those from the owners of Hobby Lobby.
Do you seriously think that the sincerity of the beliefs is the only thing the court takes into consideration?
Dear China: YOU BUILT IT. I think if it was a problem, you'd have mentioned something before now...
China didn't build the OS, and that's where the concern comes from.
Uh, after the continued revelations by whistleblowers here, I'm just curious. What exactly is your basis for believing anything Obama says on this matter?
I don't believe what he says on the matter. I like to keep bringing it up so people remember that this is the hope and change that they voted for.
If people don't recognize the results of their votes, they aren't going to change the way they vote.
I'd put down good money that he doesn't even have a grasp of how much data that would constitute, and how much that would cost.
How much would it be? Serious question. Phone audio compresses very well, after all.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?
