If you can stream it with entertaining commentary (like Mystery Science Theater 2000), then you can get viewers.

Yes, but are you willing to (roughly) double your internet bill to get that redundancy? If you are like most people, probably not.

Specifically, if you are interested in buying some from companies who already have them, you can go here.
Presumably they will get more and more expensive until it's cheaper to just get hardware that supports IPv6.

Those are lousy reasons to take away someone's freedom. The walled garden hasn't kept malware off devices, and Android has shown you can get all the benefits of the walled garden without giving up the freedom.

There are always more people who will try to take control of your device if they can. We've seen this play out before with Microsoft Palladium....first being a way to ensure you had legal copies of windows, then expanding to mean you could only play media approved by the RIAA/MPAA etc. Fortunately it got dropped back then.

Even in this story we have a story where Apple is censoring software (alternate browsers), making the lives of their users worse.

Let's be honest, writing enterprise Java is enough to kill anyone's passion. That stuff sucks your soul out until you make it to architect level (then you spend your time sucking other people's soul out).

She should find a job that interests her more (while lets be honest, work is called work because it's not fun). Then, if that job happens to be embedded programming, she get a raspberry pi and work with it for a while. After a couple months she should be more than proficient enough to find a job in embedded.

In any case look through job postings until she finds something interesting. Once again, work is generally not interesting.

If you could install your own browser on iOS, then browsers wouldn't be a problem. Because of the walled garden, you can't.

"Walled garden" isn't a tired argument against iOS, it is a very serious problem, but fanboys would rather ignore it or call it 'worn out.' In reality it sucks and there's no need for it, and plenty of reasons to not have it.

Look into the history of the many forks, for starters.

This quote is why full and immediate disclosure is important:

Usually an admin can solve the problem with a firewall, or by temporarily disabling a feature, or something similar. Don't leave people open to attack.

rotfl because BSD people are totally sane. Compare the fighting around the *BSDs with the fighting around Linux. Linux is much more sane.

ok, so what are you saying? What should be done, then?

The fifties to the seventies saw the recovery from world war 2 (and internal war), and a lot of money from the US to Greece. That's not going to happen again.

Or is there a different plan you are talking about?

If you want your software to be used by as many people/corporations as possible, use BSD.
If you don't want corporations to take advantage of your software without giving back, then use GPL.

BSD expands usage at the cost of community; GPL increases community at the cost of usage. Both approaches are valid.

What plan are you talking about to increase Greek productivity?

AFAICT anyone with lots of Euros in Greece already got them out of the country years ago. It's been rather obvious this was coming for a long time......

Yeah, I can't think of any scenario where bitcoin would help Greece at all. The only thing I can see is speculators mindlessly driving up the price of bitcoins.....