Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Maybe because the movies were not that good? (Score 5, Insightful) 360

More specifically, the actors weren't so great. Hot grits are happy to note that Natalie Portman has had plenty of roles in movies since then, but she was one of the best actors in the series (not great, but still). Same with Harrison Ford: he was in a league above everyone else in Star Wars 4-6.

I don't think the summary is right either....what actor launched their career from Harry Potter? What actor launched their career from Twilight? What actor launched a career from Transformers? It seems like blockbuster movie series normally don't launch huge acting careers, so how is Star Wars really different? Maybe because Carrie Fischer wrote a book about how her career didn't take off?

Really though, #firstWorldProblems. Actors have trouble becoming 'stars,' have trouble making millions. This is so sad I'm about to cry.

Comment Re:Obligatory xkcd (Score 1) 124

Related to that link, a quote from the article:

Some of the ingredients, such as copper from the brass vessel, kill bacteria grown in a dish – but it was unknown if they would work on a real infection or how they would combine.

So they were trying to take it a step beyond 'killing bacteria grown in a dish.' They used it on mice skin (still not a human trial, of course).

Funny quote from the article:

Sourcing authentic ingredients was a major challenge, says Harrison. They had to hope for the best with the leeks and garlic because modern crop varieties are likely to be quite different to ancient ones – even those branded as heritage. For the wine they used an organic vintage from a historic English vineyard......Bullocks gall was easy, though, as cow's bile salts are sold as a supplement for people who have had their gall bladders removed.

Comment Re:STEM *is* Humanities (Score 1) 397

STEM is about organizing ones thoughts for clarity, something "humanities" strives to do, and in trying, often misses the mark by a wide berth.

Frankly, more and more STEM degrees miss the mark by a wide berth as well. We call people who had the misfortune to graduate from such a university "stack overflow programmers."

Comment Re:Not another new rendering "engine" (Score 1) 122

Just how hard is it to render HTML?

Hard. If you don't render the page exactly like other browsers, and the web pages 'break' in your browser as a result, then no one will use your browser. The result is you need pixel-perfect rendering of a standard that was designed specifically to not allow pixel-perfect rendering. And of course, there are multiple HTML standards......

Comment Re:I agree .. BUT .... (Score 0) 232

angular, ionic, grunt, promises, JSX, reactjs, compass, gulp, firebase... the list could go on and on and on, these are just things I've started researching over the last few weeks, to make sure I make the right choice.

All of those things you just listed are the wrong choice. Seriously. Web-app development hasn't settled down yet, it's still in the exploratory phase, so expect any framework you use to be backwards-incompatible if not completely outdated within a few years.

There is still not a really great solution to web front-end development (and the cynical side of me says that HTML/CSS/Javascript are the wrong answers as well).

Slashdot Top Deals

Genetics explains why you look like your father, and if you don't, why you should.

Working...