Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Stop using lithium! (Score 1) 185

The reason lithium-6 deuteride is used in thermonuclear weapons is because it creates tritium and deuterium once bombarded with X-rays produced by the detonation of a fission device, which can then fuse due to the heat and pressure of said detonation to make an even bigger bang; and it's a more maintainable device due to not having to deal with refreshing the tritium all the time because it tends to half-life away, unlike the stable lithium-6 deuteride.

Also, lithium-6 is separated from the >92% of lithium-7 specifically for the creation of nuclear weapons, which nobody is doing anymore because the nuclear powers already have shit tons of it laying around from decommissioning warheads. Which also says nothing about how your phone battery has exactly 0.0% deuterium in it, and even if it did, it's unlikely that you'd be bombarding your phone battery with the X-ray output of a fission bomb at the moment of supercriticality; and if you were, you'd likely have other problems. Like being a wisp of vapor being quickly scattered over the landscape.

Comment Re:Whatever ... (Score 2) 141

I'm thankful for that. The failure mode of most mechanical problems with an average car is that it gently rolls to the side of the road. The failure mode of most mechanical problems with an average light aircraft is plummeting to death, and likely destroying something below you in the process.

Think of all the nitwits you see on the freeway, and then imagine them with hands on stick in a Cessna. No, thanks.

Comment Re:We should stop using the word renewable (Score 1) 317

Burning wood is far better for the environment than burning coal or oil. Planting new trees will pull the carbon out of the air to make the tree grow, and trees replenish many orders of magnitude faster than coal or oil. It also doesn't release nearly the chemical filth that burning oil and coal does.

Wood may not be as energetic as oil or coal, but not exactly "bad."

Comment Re:And now why this can not be done in the USofA (Score 1) 317

To US Energy Dept. estimated, in 2012, that there is ~12GW worth of power that could be tapped from existing, non-power-producing dams [energy.gov]. That's handily 10% more hydro than what we've got now.

10%? Check your math.

One dam on the Columbia puts out 6.8GW by itself.

Comment Re:And now why this can not be done in the USofA (Score 2) 317

It's more a problem that pretty much any river in the US that is suitable for a large hydro project, already has large hydro projects built in the 1930s through 1960s.

We weren't afraid of mega-dam projects in the past - look at some of the dams on the Columbia as proof, specifically the Grand Coulee Dam which holds back 9 km^3 of water and produces 6800 MW of power - over 3x what Hoover Dam puts out. And it's one of 14 dams on the Columbia.

Comment Re:What a stupid piece. (Score 2) 317

There's a reason why we have both the words "renewable" and "sustainable" - they do not mean the same thing.

Costa Rica will get more rain, which will "renew" the reservoirs behind the hydro dams. It's not raining 100% of the time, and the hydro dams release more volume of water than the rain provides in the same unit time, so it's not completely sustainable. But it is still a renewable resource.

Comment Re:What on earth (Score 1) 234

The problem being it's utter bollocks [google.com]. Anything that becomes molten will mix into the fuel and dilute it, lowering the reaction rate and moving you further and further away from a self-sustaining reaction.

That's not the only reason it's complete horseshit - once you actually get to the center of the planet, the melting whatever that magically never dilutes would be moving opposite of gravity.

The whole concept is patently stupid.

Slashdot Top Deals

So you think that money is the root of all evil. Have you ever asked what is the root of money? -- Ayn Rand

Working...