Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Inaccurate Headline. (Score 1) 478

In Catholic Theology, the Immaculate Conception doesn't refer to the Virgin Birth of Jesus, but to the conception of Mary without original sin.

I guess it's possible that these baby boa constrictors are especially sinless, but you probably won't be able to decide on that issue by reading Biology Letters.

Comment Re:Advice, Dawg (Score 1) 842

Agreed. I speak from experience. My first job was for a small company where the bosses loved cars and stuff that I considered "macho B.S.". Was I an elitist? Yes. But, I feel that my problems extended beyond "being the first on the chopping block". It was a fully unsatisfying experience, being the guy who just shows up, pulls his 8 hours, and leaves. I may not be ecstatic about every job I have, but fitting in is now a big requisite when I go on interviews.

(And I admit that I was a snob. I should have tried harder to fit in. You are preparing for the next few years of your life. Do you really want to half of every day alone in a cubicle? Or do you want some social interaction at the water cooler/lunch room/whatever?)

Comment Re:Too much weight (Score 1) 89

Humans need a pressurised environment and a continuous supply of oxygen/food/water, and generally prefer to be returned to earth at some point.
Robots need none of this so can be sent with a lot less mass (cost) and dont need resupply or recovery. So even if they are less capable than humans, you can send more of them for the same cost and they can stay a lot longer.

Comment Re:Wrong (Score 1) 459

Not for a useful meaning of "potential customer". If I publish a Mario clone for iPhone my potential customers are iPhone owners who would consider playing a Mario clone or who fail to understand my description of the game and think they're buying something else. In talking about potential customers you have to think about the market of people who want your product.

So how do you get an accurate count of the people who want your product? You can't. Also, what do you mean by "want"? Are willing to try it for free? Are willing to pay for it?

It's rather obvious that the number of people who are willing to try something for free is far bigger than the number of people willing to pay money for it. Yet the industry's estimate compares the number of non-pirates who were willing to pay the asking price to the number of pirates who were willing to try it for free. It's comparing apples to oranges. It's a completely meaningless statistic.

But that's the entire point! The number of pirated copies is completely irrelevant when estimating the number of lost sales.

No, it isn't. If 80.000 people pirate my Mario clone then, ignoring publicity effects, the number of lost sales is somewhere between 0 and 80.000. So at least it gives an upper bound, which is more than knowing the number of people with an iPhone does.

But a hard upper bound is not the same as a meaningful estimate. The number of iPhone owners also gives an upper bound to the number of lost sales.

But more than that: the industry's logic that "anywhere between 0 and 80,000 == 80,000" is completely wrong, yet that is what they do: they don't claim that this is a (very loose) upper bound, they claim it's the number of lost sales. And that's a lie.

There are 6 relevant figures:

A. The number of people with jailed phones who bought the product

B. The number with jailed phones who didn't buy

C. The number with jail-broken phones who bought

D. The number with jail-broken phones who pirated it but would buy it if they couldn't pirate (~= lost sales)

E. The number who pirated it but would never buy it

F. The number with jail-broken phones who neither bought nor pirated it.

We are given two figures: (A + B) / (C + D + E + F) ~= 9 ; (A + C) / (D + E) ~= 0.25. That is simply insufficient information to even estimate D.

True, but which of the following two claims would you say is most likely:

A/B =~ (C+D)/(E+F)
E =~ 0

The industry is claiming the second one is true. TFA says the first is a more reasonable assumption. I'm inclined to agree with TFA.

Comment Require devices to have ability to be blocked (Score 1) 432

I agree with the solution to remove the driver, the car should drive itself. In the meantime the FCC should require all communication devices have a method to block usage within a small radius with the exception of 911 calls. Then cars (front seat only), schools (Kids spend more time texting during class than they do paying attention), federal buildings, and other locations can essentially disable the ability to use any communication device.

Comment Pointless in Vegas (Score 5, Insightful) 597

Las Vegas has made card-counting a non-factor. Between high deck-count shoes, variant games with unfavorable rules ("Super Fun 21"), and early shuffle thresholds, even a player keeping a perfect count cannot create a significant edge. And the million people who show up to try their hand at it and fail far make up for the cost of the few who can eek something out anyway.

Comment Reverse that (Score 1) 167

Before leaving the computer I just press WinKey+L.

Now, having to log in -again- when I return is slow and error-prone, especially while sipping coffee. The solution is obviously to use the same software to auto-login a soon as it detects the presence of a user.

Slashdot Top Deals

It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.

Working...