They made threats against her. Yes. That is a real crime. Threats are a crime. People seem to forget that, but it doesn't change the law.
I'm pretty sure that most jurisdictions limit it to credible threats being crimes. People forget that part, even more often.
You're blaming him for your lack of willpower?
It's called a joke.
What, do you reinstall Deus Ex every time someone mentions that game too?
...
Goddamn it...
Blocked in the US (shocker) but no worries. I have it on my NAS. Thank you, though.
No, I meant I blame him that I'm going to spend the evening watching a movie with Steve Guttenberg in it.
He might have had a male mentality, but he wasn't humanoid. He was basically a tall WALL-E. "Closer than R2D2" still leaves a lot of ground to cover.
Johnny 5 was a sentient robot, not an android (not human-shaped).
Dammit, now I have to find the HDD with that movie on it. I blame you.
Citation needed... Oh that right, you can't, because we don't even know the rules they voted on!
They voted whether to classify ISPs as common carriers under Title II of the Communications Act. And they eschewed some of the restrictions, like TFA said, so if you want to know then GOOGLE THE FUCKING LAW. The new restrictions are a subset of that.
Christ, people just spew shit out and don't even bother TRYING to inform themselves.
I'm glad to see at least one other person on a supposedly "technical" website has the first fucking clue what Title II is.
Your hatred of Comcast and fear of what it might do has lead to the biggest restrictions on freedom since the Patriot Act
Your sense of reality needs to be rebooted. "Might do?" They've been doing it openly, for a couple of years now, you twit. You're the one pissing your panties over imaginary "might do" and using bullshit conspiracy theorist "reasoning". Look up how much censorship power Title II gave over landlines, for starters.
Jesus Tapdancing Christ. You need your dosage upped.
I wouldn't call it a "mass exodus." The most popular subverse is "News" with just over 3k subscribers, and there's obviously going to be people on both.
Which isn't to say that I hope it (or another site) doesn't succeed. This picture thing, in spite of all the headlines it's getting, is really a nothing in the ocean of dumbfuckery that's been going on at reddit for the past couple of years (The latest apparently being "gold-only" subreddits).
Someone already has (before this started). Can't remember the domain, though. Started with a V. If I come across it I'll post back.
I just hope they keep the code in place so RES can work.
reddits policy change is moral in that it is an attempt to return property to its rightful owner?
The owner of an image and the subject in the image are not necessarily the same person. This has nothing to do with "rightful owners."
Mice are all fuckers.
The whole point of slapping - or other low-intensity violence - is to show the victim's very body is perpetrator's possession, to do with as they please. Please explain how describing this as ownership is hyperbolical?
You actually need to show that "the whole point of [low-intensity violence] is to show the victim's body is the perpetrator's possession" first. Once you manage to establish that as something other than bullshit, then I'll take the onus from there. Good luck.
It's not a fight between equals, it's some douchebag asserting their power - their ownership - over someone else.
Other than the "ownership" hyperbole, you're right, regardless of the posterior plumbing of the douchebag.
Because you don't slap someone who might punch back, precisely because it does nothing but anger the target, but only someone who you think is incapable of fighting back either physically or even legally
Except the numbers show that, obviously, people do just that. And when a stronger target DOES hit back, the attacker takes more hurt than gives.
People engaging in such bullying absolutely should be made examples of, and deserve no one's sympathy when they are. Goddamn overgrown schoolyard bullies.
I used to agree with this just as vehemently as you seem to. When the bullies started coming up without a Y-chromosome, though, I'm sexist enough to content myself with discrediting them.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion
