I don't have a problem with ebooks being more expensive. For me, they are much more useful and thus more valuable. I'm willing to pay more for an electronic copy and so are a lot of people. In the end, that's what determines the price. The cost of the raw materials only establishes a floor beyond which the publishers will lose money. It has very little to do with the fair price.

Every time I go into a Barnes and Noble store, it kills me that I can't buy ebooks for my Kindle there. The ideal bookstore for me would be one that I can browse the inventory, read part of the book, then take the book or a card to a register where they will send an ebook to my device or put it on a memory stick. Right now, I go into the store, find stuff I'm interested in, then buy it from Amazon. There's basically no way for me to support my local book stores because they don't sell anything I want.

Talk about setting the bar low? They believe the second generation will be more successful? It couldn't be less successful, could it?

Pretending that Android is not Linux is intellectually dishonest.

Is there any reason why Android couldn't be built on top of a different operating system? Does the fact that it's sitting on top of Linux matter?

The point is that the government attorney was seeking 35 years. That's not a reasonable punishment for the government to seek. Now more information about Carmen Ortiz is surfacing and it's just getting worse and worse for the government.

How many immediate family members do not recognize a suicidal condition in someone? But we expect a lawyer to see it?

First, lots of people knew about Swartz' depression, especially his family. Secondly, the US attorney's office is being criticized for not seeking justice, but for seeking unusually harsh punishment. Swartz was afraid of being sentenced to 30 years in prison. You don't think 30 years is excessive?

Like John Lennon once said, time you enjoy wasting isn't wasted.

I was responding to the claim that Metro apps are designed to be used on desktops with mouse & keyboard *and* touch devices by pointing out big problems with Metro on the desktop.

So, Metro apps are designed to be used by both Desktops with keyboards and mice, and touch devices (some of which are also desktops).

Metro works nicely on handheld touchscreen devices. On the desktop? Meh. I have a couple of 2560x1440 panels. Windows knows that I have a mouse and keyboard and the monitors are not touch screens. It should be smart enough to come up with a better UI for this configuration. It's ridiculous that when I open the weather app, it goes full screen. Does Microsoft really believe four million pixels are needed to tell me if it's going to rain tomorrow?

As a developer, Metro sucks. Windows really are invaluable when programming. I want my IDE open, API docs open, the application running, a console tailing a log, and maybe even a chat window or email client running. I have more than enough pixels and I'm running an operating system called "Windows". Why can't I actually have windows?

People aren't more hyped because console gaming just isn't that interesting anymore. In our house we have a Wii and a PS3. My kids have iPod touches, my wife has an iPad. Lots of video games are played in my house - all of them on the handheld devices. I'm the only one who ever powers up the PS3 anymore and that's to play Rocksmith once or twice a month.

The console makers aren't just competing with each other, they are also competing with platforms that have free and very low cost games. I really have a hard time spending more than $10 for a game these days. There are just too many awesome low cost choices out there these days and I don't have enough time to take advantage of all of them.

2560x1440 is still pretty low res on anything bigger than a handheld device. I work with text all day and I want at least a 300 dpi display.

Lots of people understand perfectly well how the new interface works but still prefer the old interface because for what they do, it is better.

I'll probably switch to Windows 8 for the performance improvements and buy a better window manager (or whatever it's called in the Windows world).

It's interesting that you didn't argue against the brutal ugliness and crappy UX of business software.

Obviously, some people are into this stuff as you obviously are, but you have to admit that most VS devs are in it only for that red hot job market.

I recommend trying some objective-c development. It's actually pretty cool. I've only done the most rudimentary stuff, but I wish I could do more.

Part of the reason I think Microsoft's grip is slipping is the brutal ugliness of so many business apps that crappy corporate devs crank out with their wizardly IDEs. Businesses depend on it, but nobody likes it and nobody is passionate about it.

Fortunately for Microsoft, Apple seems to be trying to get rid of any non-consumer use of their products. Despite this, businesses are looking for ways to accommodate employees who want to use the Apple gear at work.

1280x720? That's disappointing. What the hell is Microsoft thinking?

Microsoft is making more money as they become less influential and relevant to consumer electronics.