and the court is generally bound to prior rulings unless overturned by new legislation.
Or the court overturns itself, which it usually reluctant to do, but certainly can be done.
In all likelihood, your lawyer would not have advised you about the possible implications of that clause since it is simply something that is not done.
IANAL, but that sounds like the sort of thing that would be legal malpractice.
Once the problem was evident, Schneider said they contacted Amazon Web Services at the end of April. Amazon acted in a professional way, the researchers said, by notifying those account holders of the security issues.
So it certainly was an issue until they looked into it (and still is an issue if some fraction of their users are too lazy to fix it).
You don't get a presumption of innocence in war. Or a trial of your peers. You find a desperate way to surrender, or you get a bullet in a vital organ. The military's job is to kill people and break things. If a so-ridiculously-below-contempt-scumbag like bin laden gets a bullet, I don't think you'll see too many people here crying tears. That is one objective tax dollar's fulfilled successfully.
If you disagree, US citizen or not...well, fuck you.
It shows that if you are the kind of asshole that stands against civilization, that just wants to kill and create havoc, you'll be tracked down and dealt with.
That's all well and good, but how do you explain the past nine years? It's not like the people hiding him didn't know what was going on.
Face the truth. There were dozens, hundreds, THOUSANDS of people, who knew where Bin Laden was. I could dance around the common factor, but quite simply it is that they, and he, are (*ahem*...were) muslim.
the US managed to always find a way to kill a lot of civilians (by accident they claim)
Yes, of course, the US kills civilians as a matter of policy.
If this is the bullshit that gets modded up, why do any of us sane people even bother?
Man must shape his tools lest they shape him. -- Arthur R. Miller