Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Indie scene is pretty neat... (Score 1) 315

Nope, that was unrelated. Penny Arcade did a comic series on Minecraft, and the resulting traffic buckled Notch's homegrown registration/payment/account management system. He moved it to the Amazon Cloud over the weekend and has been optimizing the minecraft.net site since then.

Comment Re:Been running Eyefinity, my thoughts... (Score 1) 111

Nvidia users are supposed to get triple-head gaming with SLI support later in April with the new driverset for Fermi. It will require two or more cards in SLI as they only offer dual output cards. The feature name is 3d Vision Surround, but the triple-head feature is not tied to the 3d vision part.

Comment Re:Absorbed not necessarily equal to electricity (Score 1) 439

The problem with current panels isn't the efficiency. More efficiency is welcome but the real problem with solar panels is the cost. It takes too many years to recoup the very heavy initial investment. If the price can be made such that the panels pay for themselves with 2 or 3 years then they make solar power a real alternative to the grid.

We have relatively cheap panels as well, but their problem is low efficiency. The current higher efficiency panels usually need exotic materials and manufacturing processes. If this new tech can replace both groups of cells, then it would be a huge boon.

Comment Re:Sweet spot (Score 1) 1027

If you reverse a charge for goods or services that were actually delivered to you, you are committing fraud and deserve to have your account suspended. Their refund policy is clearly stated, and you agree to it whenever you make a purchase.

I was unable to play the game due to a widely reported problem. So the service was in fact NOT delivered to me.

Of course the game was delivered to you, you just had a technical problem with your PC preventing you from actually playing it. This isn't any different than when you buy physical media from a retail store. If you had the same issue with a physical copy of a PC game and tried to take it back to Best Buy, they would have told you to piss off because you had already opened it. There are plenty of legitimate things to criticize about digital distribution in general and Steam in particular, but this isn't really one of them as it applies equally to physical media.

Comment Re:Sweet spot (Score 0, Troll) 1027

But the important thing is they told me the refund they gave me was a one time thing. Even though I asked for it within 48 hours of the purchase I was treated like I tried to download the game, play it, and return it. And if you reverse the charge on your card? Your account is suspended and you lose ALL your games. .

If you reverse a charge for goods or services that were actually delivered to you, you are committing fraud and deserve to have your account suspended. Their refund policy is clearly stated, and you agree to it whenever you make a purchase.

Comment Re:Sweet spot (Score 2, Informative) 1027

You opted in because you left the game on "Always Keep This Game Up-To-Date". Of course, if you re-downloaded the game from scratch I'd imagine you wouldn't have a choice as it would install the newest update. Ultimately, this is the game developer's fault, not Steam. They chose to patch their game with that content and make that the default patch level on Steam. Steam is just the distribution platform, they don't have any creative or content control regarding the games.

Comment Re:Abuse of dominant marketshare... (Score 1) 297

No comment on the technical legality of Amazon's de-listing, but it's certainly an abuse of power by conventional standards.

No. Amazon sells eBooks for less than $10. MacMillan doesn't like that idea, and wants $15. Amazon is under no obligation to sell MacMillan's books if MacMillan won't agree to Amazon's terms.

I don't even like the idea of a $10 eBook, much less a $15 one, so I guess I won't be buying any MacMillan eBooks either....

My understanding of the article is that Amazon delisted ALL McMillan books, not just ebook versions that were impacted by the pricing change. I don't think Amazon has anything close to a monopoly on distribution of either physical or digital books, so there probably isn't anything illegal about this. It sounds shady as hell, though. It's basically using your large marketshare/leverage in one market to force your will on customers/vendors in another market.

Slashdot Top Deals

"When the going gets tough, the tough get empirical." -- Jon Carroll

Working...