Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:The economies of many nations? Try the sconomy (Score 1) 190

Someone from Canada is Canadian. Someone from the USA is USAian. Get used to it, it'll become common usage soon enough.

I'm from the US, fairly well traveled, and unlike you I do not live in my mother's basement. I lived in Europe for awhile (Turkey, Germany, UK).. they call us Americans.. I've screwed a couple of women from Chile and Argentina down in South America.. they call us Americans.

The only, and I mean ONLY fucking place I've heard the idiotic term USian is here, so fuck your 'it'll be common usage soon enough' remark. You're just another term of SJW... (oh no mommy, it's the big bad cultural imperialists!)

FYI I've lived in 5 different countries on 4 different continents, first second and third world countries among them, and am about as far from my parents basement as its possible to get.

I'm hoping that 'Americans' will stop being used for people from the USA. Its just a dream I have. USAian is great suck it up, it'll become a meme real soon now.

Comment Re:The economies of many nations? Try the sconomy (Score 1) 190

I'm not sure why you would need to distinguish like that. Canadians are not american, they are north american just like the mexicans even though there is the artificial central america designation for the area. Or do south americans somehow fail to qualify for your quirk in reasoning? America is not the continent, its North America. There is also a South America, and an invented Central America if you want to jump from continental designation to a useful geographic distinction.

What you essentially are doing is trying say that heard looks like a flock so you will create a term like dogian to distinguish a pack of dogs. The problem is, theee are already valid names and terms that achieve the goal and it is pure ignorance when other terms are invented and substituted.

Canadians and people from the USA are in a matching category to French and people from Germany.

To refer to people from Germany as 'Europeans' while, in the same context, referring to people from France as 'French' makes no sense.

And actually, thinking about it, someone from Chile is also an American just as much as someone from Monaco is European.

Someone from Canada is Canadian. Someone from the USA is USAian. Get used to it, it'll become common usage soon enough.

Comment Re:The economies of many nations? Try the sconomy (Score 1) 190

Whatever word you want to use. We have people here in the USA who namecall that way. They use terms like 'Commie' to refer to those foreign people they don't like. Welcome to the same league, dude.

Funnily enough, the original 'USAian' is a term I use myself when wanting to distinguish between eg people from Canada and people from the USA (and I'm not the AC who used it above).

It just feels wrong to refer to 'people from the usa' as 'Americans' when there are Canadians present. It would be like referring to Germans as 'Europeans' in the same context as referring to French people as 'French'.

I don't think its got anything to do with the name of the country ending in 'America'; 'America' is the continent not the country (until they annex Canada and Mexico).

Referring to them as 'Americans' degrades the American-ness of the entire rest of the continent.

As it is, people from the USA are mostly outside my monkeysphere anyway, its like they are all just instances of the same domesticated primate.

Comment Re:The economies of many nations? Try the sconomy (Score 1) 190

Wow.. If using fucktarded repeatedly didn't show how fucking stupid you are, using USian as if it was an actual word most certainly does.

Here is a hint, the accepted term- even internationally is American. It is because the country is the United States of America and is the only country in north or south America that ends it's country name with America. Other countries have America in their official names, but they do not end it with America in neither their official language or the English version of the name so no other country has claim to the usage.

Would you prefer 'Yank'?

Comment Re:Well it's better than blasting out a radio sign (Score 1) 157

If you could fluctuate the luminosity of a star to announce your presence, then it would make more sense to make it flash prime numbers. Or encode such a message by varying the frequency, or by stopping and starting the device that produces the effect. Well, maybe they are doing just that, and I suppose that a pulsing star or the machine that makes it pulse doesn't exactly stop on a dime, so it may be worth keeping an eye on that thing for a couple of years, and watch for changes.

If it flipped between primes and golden mean, THEN we'd have something undeniably artificial.

Comment Re:Enlighten me please (Score 1) 450

More ports is not universally better. If you tried to sell me a laptop that had a full-sized parallel port, for example, I'd say, that's dumb, it's making the laptop way bigger than it needs to be, and I'll never use it.

Apple may have gone too far in that direction (personally I think two USB-C ports and a headphone jack would have been the optimal place), but less ports *can* be better than more ports, depending on the circumstances.

Microphone jack would be nice too...

Comment Large scale testing? (Score 1) 97

So you'd take samples from sewage outlet pipes, get the dogs to sniff them. Keep following upstream from positive samples until you have street addresses. Invite anyone at that address to get tested.

If this could work in the early stages of cancer it could save a fortune in lives as well as money.

Comment Re:To avoid muddle don't meddle in the middle (Score 1) 85

Yes, because 100 people can do that.

100 people can rouse 100 more and they another 100 more and so on until you have an army that can overthrow an empire.

At this time the 'Stans are not very radical, heck Kazakhs will do a vodka toast and prayers right after! And Kazakh women don't seem to have any problem marrying infidel men. They are very chill about their Islam. But that could change if the right seeds are sewn. I hope not but I could see it unfolding. I have heard that many young people in the 'Stans are turning against their parents and grandparents because they feel that they don't follow the religion closely enough. That'd be a disturbing trend.

Comment Re:To avoid muddle don't meddle in the middle (Score 1) 85

Well, to be fair, the US doesn't get involved in Tibet nearly as much as China does.

And they do have a Muslim terrorist problem, they just handle it differently. Google "Uyghur Muslim" for more information.

With Guantanamo inmates being sent to Kazakhstan we can almost see the ground being laid for the scenario which plays out in Diamond Age; radicalisation of the 'Stans, reaction against Chinas heavy handedness toward their Muslim population etc.

Comment Re:Could argue the exact opposite (Score 1) 532

People love to hate on aggression. Aggression is not just the desire to hurt. It is also the desire to act - to explore, to create, to save, and the desire to fight back against evil. A world without aggression would make those idiots that talk about people being 'sheeple' correct.

Does aggression cause problems? Yes. So does complaisance. I for one am glad people have aggression, as opposed to being a bunch of complaisant, laid-back lemmings.

The problem is not excess aggression. It is insufficient self control. The inability to put off current desires in order to obtain greater rewards later on.

This is really a basic tenet of what might be called 'Nietszcheanism'.

Its possible for humans to live a life of 'poverty, dirt and miserable ease' ie where their life is awful and boring and drab but at the same time its so easy and safe that they can't be bothered doing anything about it. Its aggression, dissatisfaction and greed that gets them to step up and demand more from life and to live beyond that state of miserable ease.

Comment Re:Actually (Score 1) 532

Man's biggest failure may be failing to stand up to aggression, but get RID of aggression? Not going to happen, and not a good thing if it did. Leaders are aggressive.

Aggression, along with greed and selfishness are absolutely essential to the existance of life itself. They are at the very root of life. No living thing exists without doing so at the expense of another living thing and must be selfish, greedy and aggressive to survive and propagate. Even cyanobacteria exist at the expense of other cyanobacteria; occupying space that another cyanobacteria would like to occupy.

Get rid of aggression, selfishness and greed and you get rid of life.

Comment Re:Would it matter? (Score 1) 576

What makes you think it is so limited? Perhaps they have matter replicators on-board that only require power and they can refuel at any star.

The ship itself becomes a self-sustaining factory that runs forever, making anything you need, including spare parts for the ship.

The external power source is any nearby star for fuel. With enough fuel, there is no supply chain, just the ship.

The example I was responding to involved M1 tanks and the US military of today. I don't think that the US military has replicator technology.

Slashdot Top Deals

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...