Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: Time for another letter (Score 1) 462

Don't think I haven't considered it.

I'm of two minds regarding politics:

(1) I'm so sick if the Washington nonsense that sometimes I wish I could just forget the whole thing, tune it out, and just go on with my life. That usually lasts two minutes, because it does, and will, affect me whether I want it to or not.

(2) actually run and bring back as much inside info as I can, to REALLY inform my employer (the CITIZENS I represent) of the nonsense that goes on. Really try to do some good and represent We, the People.

What worries me about (2) the most is the intense pressure that comes from big donors. I'd be concerned that I'd become just as corrupt, power-hungry, and full of myself as those in Washington.

Comment Re: TrueCrypt (Score 1) 462

You know what? Even though I don't travel with my laptop, I'm thinking the same thing.

With the recent revelations of the ability to intercept hardware en route and infect the firmware with spyware, I wonder if there's a possibility that TruCrypt could be circumvented. I suppose it could, since the data must reside in RAM unencrypted for use by the processor.

I also don't know if whole-drive encryption is really necessary (why would I encrypt my system files?) or if it has an adverse effect on SSD life.

Comment Time for another letter (Score 5, Interesting) 462

Every time I read about a new attack on the Bill of Rights, I write to my Congressional representation. I also vote to replace my representation since clearly they aren't representing We, the People.

I'm getting tired of writing these letters, yet I'll do it again and remind my "representation" of my position. Anybody else?

Comment Re:Gov't in infrastructure (Score 2) 363

That is just one tiny example of why gov't shouldn't be regulating any businesses, why it shouldn't be involved in any projects, including infrastructure - no competition. If this law passes, it just gives the gov't established monopoly a special power to tax people because they have no competition. No competing grids, no competing roads, no competing water and sewer and garbage providers, etc.etc. This company COULD, in a free market, do the same thing: impose a fee like that. However if it did, people would have a choice to switch to another provider, however that would have been done, but we can't even KNOW at this point, because of gov't meddling, which gives monopolies to the most connected players.

While I generally agree that the marketplace should decide who wins and loses, there are some things that are impractical to leave to the market. Taking your example of roads: how would you picture a road system for a city that allows for multiple "road providers?" How would new players enter the market? I ask because I can't picture having multiple road grids in the same geographical area that doesn't end up with more roads than buildings (picture downtown Chicago with the local lanes and express lanes everywhere in the city).

Comment Re:Incompetence (Score 2) 225

Actually, the revolution will be bloodless and quiet. It will, shockingly enough, happen at the ballot box.

Maybe...but I have serious doubts. Have you seem the re-election rate of the incumbents, despite the record low approval ratings of the President and Congress?

http://www.opensecrets.org/bigpicture/reelect.php

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_stagnation_in_the_United_States

Comment Re:Evil. (Score 1) 300

Will not buy.

Neither will I.

I have this distant hope that gamers will learn the lesson taught to us by cable TV. Originally cable TV was ad-free on the basis that you were paying a fee for it. Then ads were introduced and for some reason, viewers tolerated it. They grabbed their ankles and took it just like they typically do, so cable TV ads became firmly entrenched.

That's why I limit myself to cable TV packages that only have the local OTA stations (digital reception sucks). I'm not going to pay the cable carrier to show me ads on channels supposedly funded by cable fees, especially when ads are slowly taking up more time (not to mention full-length "infomercials").

Comment Re: It won't (Score 2) 163

And yet the incumbents enjoy something like an 80-90% reelection rate. That's the part that I don't understand. If Congress is doing such a lousy job, how do any of them last beyond one term?

If your representation isn't doing a good job, don't reelect them, people! Do a little bit of research and don't be afraid to vote for an independent or third party candidate. If enough voters do this it won't be a "wasted" vote and maybe, just maybe, we would start towards a Congress that truly works for We the People instead of We the Big Campaign Donors.

Comment Jack of all trades, master of none? (Score 1) 4

This seems to me like a bad idea. How can a reporter, whom is taking notes/recordings and asking questions for a story, also going to take photos?

I see one of two things happening:

(1) the photo staff is rehired after the quality of the photos for publication takes a nosedive;

(2) the Chicago Sin Times f

Submission + - Chicago Sun Times fires photo staff, has iPhone photo training for reporters (cultofmac.com) 4

frdmfghtr writes: Cult of Mac is running a story where the reporters of the Chicago Sun-Times are being given training in iPhone photography, to make up for the firing of the photography staff. From the CoM story:

"The move is part of a growing trend towards publications using the iPhone as a replacement for fancy, expensive DSLRs. Itâ(TM)s a also a sign of how traditional journalism is being changed by technology like the iPhone and the advent of digital publishing."

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.

Working...