Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re: OneNote (Score 4, Interesting) 133

The parallels here are so obvious it is laughable. He is trying to take control of his life and you're saying that the control should be handled over to a corporation known to abandon support for it's products as people are still making use of them. All due to a broken business model. GNU/Linux and vi should be enough to get such a simple job done.

Comment Re:Get rid of those things (Score 1) 944

You're better off heating with a heat pump—it's about three times more efficient than resistive heat, which is what you get out of a light bulb. Of course, if all you have is resistive heat, you're right that it makes no difference, but people who live in cold climates typically don't use resistive heat because it's so bloody expensive. We use oil, or gas, or heat pump, or wood, or some combination of these.

Heat Pumps don't work when it's below freezing.

Comment Re:Get rid of those things (Score 3, Insightful) 944

If you have a brain, you got rid of those fucking things more than 5 years ago.

It would be a pretty stupid thing to buy and expensive LED or other bulb to put in a crawlspace, or attic, or even a closet. Payback will never happen. Not enough energy used to make a difference either.

I am not an Electrician, but I'm pretty sure that you aren't supposed to use incandescent lights in a closet because of the fire risk involved. An attic or crawlspace, which will have exposed insulation and other combustibles that aren't behind a firewall (Drywall) like the other parts of your home, probably shouldn't have those in there either. It produces a very real and tangible safety issue. House fires started in concealed places are the worst as you can be in your home and not notice until it's too late.
While you use these for a short amount of time, it is easy to leave one on. Just spend the $5-$25 for the remote possibility of saving a $100,000 - $1,000,000 structure.

Blackberry

BlackBerry Posts $4.4 Billion Loss, Will Outsource To Foxconn 141

iONiUM writes "Today BlackBerry announced a $4.4 billion loss, and a deal with Foxconn to outsource hardware manufacturing. One interesting stat is that 75% of sales were actually older BB7 devices. That said, CEO John Chen says, 'We are very much alive, thank you.' He adds, 'Our "for sale" sign has been taken down and we are here to stay. BlackBerry recently announced it has entered into an agreement to receive a strategic investment from Fairfax Financial and other institutional investors, which represents a vote of confidence in the future of BlackBerry.'"

Comment Re:Yeah, no ... (Score 1) 287

It's not just Computer Science that they are doing this to, a lot of American high schools are teaching kids welding and calling it Structural Engineering. All they are doing is lying to kids by showing them the high salaries of the top men in these fields, and then teaching them to be peasants. They used to show us how to get into Engineering while in high school, we called it Calculus.

Comment Reasonable, non discriminatory regulations. (Score 1) 378

I believe in reasonable, non discriminatory regulations. There are times when Corporate Personhood can favor us in this scenario, too. A lot of activities are seen as "restricted to businesses only", however, as they are a legal person, and you are a person, they cannot have rights that you do not have.

That being said, any regulation should allow an individual to engage in the same activities as a corporation would enjoy with a drone. I think that the regulations should be simple. If flying over private property which is not yours, or without permission, the vehicle may not fly within 150 feet of a structure. If flying over private property, video footage captured over the private property should not be retransmitted, sold, or stored for any duration of time, unless a crash occurs. If flying over public or private property, an independently-tested system should detect the altitude of the vehicle and whether or not it is in free fall. If it is detected to be in free fall, and the altitude conditions warrant it, the system should deploy a parachute which is rated for the weight of the vehicle. Such systems should have an independent power and sensor source. Think of something about the size of a hotdog on the side of the vehicle. This should reduce injuries and property damage, and such systems could be made and sold as individual units that could be fitted on existing vehicles. Again, they would only be required if flying over private property without permission or in public places that aren't parks, etc.

Regulations such as these should respect everybody's rights. Existing laws about stalking, eavesdropping, and prowling should take care of any other problems that could be encountered, and we shouldn't be too quick to create more complex regulations unless new problems arise that aren't covered by current laws.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...