*EVERY* SSD is a 'specialized RAID package'.
Allyn Malventano, CTNC, USN
Storage Editor, PC Perspective
I've been using one of these for over a year. Handy for having your OS on a 4x SSD RAID. Uses only one 5.25" bay:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816710003
Be sure to get the beefier model (with the fans) if you want to use 4x VRaptors.
Allyn Malventano
Storage Editor, PC Perspective
Apple's description of the zeroing format method we used fits the description of what we wanted in terms of resetting the SSD to a clean state
Zeroing is not the same operation as TRIM. TRIM marks a block as unused, and if you read it you'll either get random data, or zeros (probably the later). Zeroing marks it as in-use, and if you read it you'll get zeros. The SSD's wear management algorithm will move the latter around as though it were real data, whereas it knows the former is "empty" so it won't bother (so the SSD will be faster). In other words, they don't seem to be using a "clean state" at all, which would explain why there's no difference.
Not only that, but writing to all free space of many SSD's will *drop* their IOPS performance since the drive now has to track *all* sectors in the LBA remap table. This is especially true with Intel drives (even the 2nd gen). Additionally, without TRIM, most drives will then continue to track all LBA's as long as used in that same Mac.
Secondly, the SSD in the Macbook Air really isn't very fast at all
A Macbook Air is just about the worst test of SSD performance, as its SATA and other busswork is run in a much reduced power mode, meaning the bottleneck is not the SSD at all. A worst-case degraded SSD in an Air will still be faster than the other bottleneck in that system.
Allyn Malventano, CTNC, USN
Storage Editor, PC Perspective
They make them without the blade:
http://www.swissarmy.com/multitools/Pages/Category.aspx?category=presentation+pro&
Allyn Malventano
Storage Editor, PC Perspective
I saw a self-destructed sample of this unit at CES in January. It did not self destruct from an opening attempt, as opening those is quite easy. The drive is enclosed by a simple clear plastic shell (not epoxy filled). The 'destruction' was caused by presumably supplying voltage in excess of the USB spec. You could literally pry the plastic off of the USB drive with the included knife, and it would work just fine (sans enclosure).
Also, it would be nice if PCWorld at would at least get the name of these things correct:
http://www.swissarmy.com/multitools/Pages/Category.aspx?category=presentation+pro&
Perhaps the USB-only part is dubbed 'Secure', but you won't ask for that name when you want to buy one.
Allyn Malventano
Storage Editor, PC Perspective
Along those lines, Anand suspected the PCB was similar to the new JMicron unit I reviewed recently. This prompted me to add another page to the article detailing the similarities between the drives:
http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=878&type=expert&pid=11
Regards,
Allyn Malventano
Storage Editor, PC Perspective
Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse