Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment You ever get the feeling... (Score 1) 575

... that MS is hemorrhaging all its decent technical staff and now the idiots are taking over the asylum at the technical level just like they've already done at the design and management level? One thing MS was usually pretty good at was testing its service packs/updates/[insert name of the week here] but this just seems like they really didn't bother doing it properly , or , they didn't have the technical know-how to do it.

Comment Hardly (Score 1) 313

They had no choice economically. None of the former states could have afforded to maintain them - then what?

Besides, while most of those former states are stable , Georgia and now Ukraine no longer are. Can you imagine nuclear weapons being added to the mix? The fewer countries that have them the better , and if thats unfair thats just tough luck. The future of humanity trumps individual nations pissing contests.

Comment I don't like cat eyes of either type (Score 1) 187

Mainly because they don't work as well as is claimed. Having a couple of dots of light every few metres isn't nearly as clear as having glowing road lines. I suppose however in their favour the eyes last much longer.

Another issue however with cats eyes is the effect they have on tyres. Its conveniently never mentioned by the govn but driving over hard lumps of metal in the road - even if they do squash down a bit - at high speed over the years when changing lanes will wear out your tyres faster and can I suspect even cause failures if the tyre is already on the verge of going.

Comment Re:Its not nothing (Score 1) 612

"you've fallen into a linguistic trap around the ambiguity of the word "why"."

No, sorry, you're not going to get away with using the "its semantics" argument. The question why is there something rather than nothing is a fundamental concept that owes nothing to language.

As I pointed out in another post - you can create nothing out of something , ie 1 + -1 = 0, but you can't do anything with that zero on its own unless you introduce a non zero term - eg a quantum fluctuation.

Comment Its not nothing (Score 1) 612

Quantum fluctuations are something. The question should actually be "Where do quantum fluctuations come from" to which a physicist will probably reply - "they just happen". Which is feck all use to anyone as an answer. Might just as well say the universe just happened or the God/The Sphagetti Monster created it.

If physicists don't have a proper answer to "Why is there something rather than nothing" then they should stop pretending they do by the deceit of changing the definition of "nothing".

Slashdot Top Deals

For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!

Working...