A whiny Israeli blogs that he doesn't like the way Facebook interviewed him. I'm going to bed.

Interesting that the OP got instantly modded down. Suppose the article was about a new computer language and the article described it as a compiler when it really was an interpreter. Bullshit would be called immediately. Same level of error, different tech.

I'd pay money to see the first run.

But I see it's already covered. Cute idea but like programming languages, there's thousands of cute engine designes that aren't practical for widespread use.

For why the government needs to DCMA physical objects in addition to media. He does the world no good with his stunt. This will come back and bite us in a year or two.

Become a Partner. You get pretty much all of their software for 10 desktops and a couple of servers for less than $500 a year.

TSA is keeping us safer. Lips moving.

They demonstrated one way data transmission over a very short distance, not a network.

I mean, really?

The Oracle/Cisco/IBM Full Employment Act

It's pretty much common knowledge in the airline industry that the takeoff and landing blackout is more about controlling pax and being able to get their attention than any interference issue.

Hard for someone on the outside to know whether it's truly broken or this is a case of "it's too hard, let's leave it out and blame Microsoft".

I am depressed.

Do you know the time intervals and stopping distances for this particular line and train set? I'd really like to know if you do. In any case, even if emergency braking for one mile just halved the speed, the energy would be reduced to 1/4 and would have certainly reduced injuries. In any case, running back to protect the train is simple and cheap. No excuse not to do it.

You clearly don't understand the definition of "fail safe". A common mistake.