Comment Re:Guilty (Score 2) 207
Interpretation of carefully worded equivocations is important specifically in this context of American corporations which are being compelled to do certain things and then not speak of them.
Is there anything close RFC 2119 for the language that these companies are using. Or can we make one?
We could help companies create stronger press releases and we could give journalists a primary source for parsing bullshit statements like "we are not collecting".
Would anyone like to help start this project with me?