Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:More eugenics propaganda? (Score 1) 192

What the bleep does race have to do with anything here? A study of one person proves very, very little. Are you claiming that blacks are considered uniformly genetically inferior to whites?

What you need to do, for genetic studies, is have people of similar genetic makeup (identical twins are best, but non-identical siblings are good) living in different situations. If you do that, you'll find that the people in better conditions do better, on the whole, but from what I've read you'll find that genetics plays a large part.

Comment Re: Wisdom from these guys? (Score 1) 267

I believe that the stock market is filled with people better able to play the market than I am. Therefore, my strategy is to buy companies I have some long-term confidence in and let them appreciate. Day trading puts me in the shark tank. Shorting on a big scale straps leaky blood bags around me and puts me in the shark tank.

Comment Re:Tesla is worth 60% of GM ! (Score 1) 267

A company that expects massive growth doesn't need a sane P/E ratio. People are counting on the earnings to go up.

Facebook looked to me like a bust, though. It opened at a psychotically insane P/E ratio, and I couldn't see how it was going to increase earnings that much (and I still can't). I consider it a strategy that worked wonderfully to make Zuckerberg rich at the expense of the investors.

Comment Re:How does the quote go...? (Score 1) 267

According to TFS, Lutz said that Tesla is a fringe brand, and will remain one until it produces lower-priced cars. Not that Tesla never would become mainstream or anything like that. Seriously, Tesla sells luxury cars and nothing else right now. That makes it a fringe brand. They have plans to make less expensive cars, and when those are selling Tesla will cease to be a fringe brand.

Comment Re:SubjectsInCommentsAreStupid (Score 1) 460

Um, whatever? False earthquake alarms aren't a problem anybody is to be blamed for, nor are failures to predict a real earthquake. Insisting that there is no earthquake danger in a certain town, and that nobody should take any protective measures, and being proven tragically wrong, is blameworthy.

Comment Re:Fox News? (Score 1) 460

Okay, how many "good ones" dismiss anything said by the "bad scientists" because of who they work for? Everybody is free to submit papers with the evidence they can scrape up, and it's essentially impossible to keep a good paper from being published at all. Thing is, the evidence is pretty convincing if you look at it skeptically and intelligently. If a scientist working for the oil companies came up with a good paper, I really doubt the origin would be a problem. If a scientist working for the oil companies comes up with opinions not backed by the evidence, well, again I really doubt the origin would be a problem.

Science, as a discipline, works with egotistic and sometimes petty individuals who are as fallible as anybody else. It works pretty well.

Slashdot Top Deals

"Here's something to think about: How come you never see a headline like `Psychic Wins Lottery.'" -- Comedian Jay Leno

Working...