Mathematicians don't know which rule has precedence for 0/0,
Ouch. +5, Informative indeed. <sigh>
Mathematicians can argue for any value at all, not just zero or one. This means that neither of your "rules" could take precedence.
Annnnd, on to your rules. Any number multiplied by zero is zero. Any nonzero number divided by itself is one. Of course, mathematicians are wont to generalize "number" to "field element". Go crack out on wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_(mathematics)
Regulation would affect companies too
Funniest thing I've read this week!
Spin, sure, but it's a waay bigger minority than I expected. I'd even say even shockingly large.
Shockingly? I think it's good that we have experts in a field developing high-impact tools who are pessimistic about the uses of those tools. If 100% were like "yeah guys no sweat, we got this!" then I would be more concerned. The result of this poll, in my mind, is that we have a healthy subset who are going to be actively working towards making AI safe.
Itâ(TM)s whether men in America and around the world are going to be duped by explosions, fire tornadoes, and desert raiders into seeing what is guaranteed to be nothing more than feminist propaganda, while at the same time being insulted AND tricked into viewing a piece of American culture ruined and rewritten right in front of their very eyes.
Is that message "Australia is a crucial part of the USA"? I'm a little confused.
The means-and-ends moralists, or non-doers, always end up on their ends without any means. -- Saul Alinsky