Journal Journal: Ralsky: "I'll be back" (rejected article)
Maybe someone beat me to it but it hasn't been posted yet.
The NY Times (free reg. req'd) reports that spam king Alan Ralsky has taken an hiatus while retooling to meet the new CAN SPAM act. He's quoted as saying the law is unfair, but adds, "You would have to be stupid" to try to violate it. Is this a case of "Do as I say, not as I do" or will he really put his money where his mouth is?
OK, it was posted several hours later