Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Unless you've spent $300 on a GPU... (Score 1) 210

The Apple version looked much better than the NES version. The PC-88 & PC-98 version absolutely demolish the NES version.

Citation needed...oh wait, I have a citation for you that proves you wrong:

http://www.hardcoregaming101.n...

Deus Ex on PS2 had crap textures, low quality soundtrack and tiny levels

They're not tiny, they're split in pieces, the port house didn't know the trick of streaming levels. But take a look at the screenshots...

http://steamcommunity.com/shar...

and the comments at the end about the nice soundtrack and how it looks a touch nicer than the PC version. And this is people on Steam saying this, one of the more anti-console forums on the net.

Half-Life on PS2 came out three years after the PC original and still looked worse than the PC version with Blue Shift,

Do you know why I'm laughing. The graphical upgrade Blue Shift brought to the PC version was provided by the never released Dreamcast version. the High Definition pack are the textures the Dreamcast version used. The PS2 version has enhancements beyond that:

http://half-life.wikia.com/wik...

The PlayStation 2 remake of Half-Life saw even further improved models to the game, also created by Gearbox. This included full facial animation and individually-animated fingers.[4] As such, they're considered a continuation of the High Definition Pack. The PlayStation 2 port took advantage of a "Level of Detail" system, allowing these very detailed models up close without sacrificing performance. Health and H.E.V. Chargers have been converted to 3D and have special animations during use. These extra HD features were never officially released for the PC version of the game.

Both had crap controls on console, rendering them unplayable.

Really, you have copies? Played them? Citation needed, because I have both within 10 feet of me and know how they support effective dual shock controls, and also support keyboard and/or mouse. I personally recommend a hybrid control scheme, using the left half of a dual shock for movement...but mouse for aiming.

Sacred 2 looked like shit on PC, but far worse on console.

What? A game that runs at true 1080p with no upscaling tricks? Even digital foundry, notoriously partisan for the PC, said that.

It was also a very mouse heavy game which again renders it virtually unplayable on a gamepad.

That's not what Sacred 2's developers say. That's not even what people on the PC version say either. Some of them actually wanted gamepad support as well.

Diablo I on PSX came out two years after the PC version and runs at such a low resolution that you can't tell what it happening on screen.

Troll. It's one of the PSone games that runs at 240p. Yes it's low but you can easily make everything out. You can easily find video or screenshots.

Diablo III on console looks like shit compared to the PC version.

That's not what notoriously PC partisan Digital Foundry said:

http://www.eurogamer.net/artic...

On the technical scale, both the PS3 and 360 are running at the equivalent to the PC version's high settings for texture assets, physics and effects - with smoothed dynamic shadows almost a match for PC's highest preset. Quibbles with internal resolution and field of view aside, this is a pristinely presented take on a year-old game that targets 60fps on both platforms, and largely succeeds in nailing exactly that.

Again, mouse centric games that are horrid on gamepad.

That's not what all the PC version players wanting gamepad support on the PC version are saying. That's also not what Jay Wilson said:

http://www.tomshardware.com/ne...

"One of the reasons why weâ(TM)re exploring the idea of a console version of Diablo 3 because we feel that the controls and the style of the game lend itself to a console," he admitted. "With some of our early experiments in putting a direct control scheme into the game via a 360-like analogue controller, Iâ(TM)ve been âOh this feels even better, with direct controlâ¦'"

(War Thunder)Still looks like ass compared to the PC version.

That's not what Gaijin entertainment says

http://www.psu.com/a021373/War...

That's not even what the screenshots and video say.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Comment Re:Unless you've spent $300 on a GPU... (Score 1) 210

but it will have 8GB of DDR3 RAM and *dedicated* GDDR5 VRAM.

I'm sorry but I linked to machine that is in the same price range of the PS4, and it doesn't have either of those. Having main memory be high speed GDDR5 is an advantage you know.

More cores != faster. A dual core Pentium G series is just as powerful as an eight core Jaguar CPU and 1.6GHz is a joke for such an anemic CPU.

Oh really? Then what about those PC gamer master race guys like you who were claiming that having more cores was more important than clock speed when talking about the PS3's CPU. You guys can't have it both ways.

The integrated GPU in the PS4 is *exactly* the same as the ones used in AMD's PC CPUs.

Why yes, the standalone 7870....which still costs about $150 right?

A low-end GPU like the Geforce 750 will provide the same performance and only costs $100.

More like $120, but that's a very recent GPU, just came out didn't it. The 7870 still has more GFLOPS than it... I checked.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...

And that $379 machine doesn't come with one of those does it?

And you're thinking like a clueless console moron who knows nothing about PCs or technology.

Really. You're going to do that know nothing console peasant thing on someone who has been running LInux for 12 years? One of the reasons I play games on consoles is so I don't have to use Windows.

Get back to me if you can get an octo-core machine with 8GB of RAM and a 7870 or GT750 for $399. But you can't.

Comment Re:Unless you've spent $300 on a GPU... (Score 1) 210

I can get a PC that is more powerful with the same amount of RAM for that price.

it won't have 8GB of GDDR5 RAM will it.

The CPU in the PS4 is the performance equivalent of a low end PC processor, such as a dual core Pentium.

BS. That's 8 1.6 GHz cores in the PS4.

The GPU, being integrated, is also pretty low end.

You're thinking like a Filthy PC Gamer bourgeoisie philistine. Integrated doesn't mean the same thing in console land. The PS4's GPU is is a customized version of AMD's 7870 GPU, with 2 CUs disabled.
That's not a traditional "integrated" GPU like you're implying.
It is most certainly better than the GT640 I've got in this Fedora machine.

Let me find a machine to compare:

http://www.amazon.com/Dell-i36...

Lets see that costs $379, has a dual core CPU, 4GB of RAM and intel HD graphics. Can that thing even run Watch Dogs?
No.

http://www.geforce.com/games-a...

Comment Re:Unless you've spent $300 on a GPU... (Score 1) 210

All of which had much worse graphics and horrible, unplayable controls compared to the PC versions, among other problems. Disasters.

Really? All of them? Which ones have you played?

  M&M 1 on the NES has enhanced graphics and sound over the Apple 2 and C64 versions.

The PS2 ports of Deus EX and Half-life, are also enhanced over the originals and support mouse and keyboard as well.

Sacred 2's developers said themselves that the game plays better and is more fun with a gamepad.

Diablo 1 on the PSone has graphical enhancements over the PC version. Diablo 3's developers said that the game worked well and was more fun with the gamepad.

War Thunder on the PS4 supports the exact same control options the PC version does and also supports using the PS4 camera for head tracking just like TrackIR.

Comment Re:Lockout chip is a big part of the problem (Score 1) 608

I think part of the problem is that lockout policies enforced by code signing, as used by Apple on iOS and by Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo on their respective consoles, are designed specifically to prevent this sort of "casual programming".

They're not there to stop casual programming, they're there to slow down every "wannabe" with a puzzle game clone who thinks he's the next Shigeru Miyamoto from publishing his tetris clone.

You can program all you want, what your'e talking about is actually "publishing for sale" not programing.

Comment Re:Cry Me A River (Score 1) 608

In 1980, a kernel or driver developer was entering data into a mainframe using punchcards in binary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V...

They most certainly weren't using vim/emacs

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V... 1976
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E... also 1976

Comment Re:Unless you've spent $300 on a GPU... (Score 1) 210

Diablo, Diablo 3.
Darkstone
C&C, Red Alert, RA Retaliation, Dune 2000
Deus Ex
Half Life, Portal
Sim City (various versions)
Civ II
Wing Commander (various versions)
DOOM
Might & Magic-foo, Wizardy-foo, Ultima-foo
Quake (various versions)
Sacred 2
IL-2 Sturmovik, Wings of Steel, War Thunder
Minecraft
Terraria
Don't Starve
You don't know jack.
X-com (the original)
Panzer General

Comment Re:Multiple PCs and multiple copies (Score 1) 210

Someone needs to explain to Valve and everyone that if

SteamBoxes are to be the "next big thing in consoles" that they need to cost like one. And to be stuck with it because people don't want to upgrade it yearly - if I spend $500 on a SteamBox, I expect to be able to play the latest games on it for 5+ years at 1080p with the same quality (or better - console graphics typically improve through its lifespan as people optimized).

This is why I think that the Steambox will end up as basically vaporware. Sooner or later someone is going to lay the facts on Gabe on how he can't always have what he wants...because it's just not practical.

Comment Re:because it fucking is (Score 1) 210

I think Sony actually had a good idea with adding a chip to the early PS3's for backwards compatibility. I think that current-gen would do better if this concept continued.

And that was one of the reason the PS3 deluxe launch model cost $599! Don't you remember all the complaints about the price, and how they should have left backwards compatibility out because people buy a new console to play new games, not old ones? Saw that right here on Slashdot.

Comment Re:the mac phenomenon (Score 1) 210

because the Xbone and PS4 are not next Gen consoles. They are at best last gen.5

I don't agree. The PS3 has a single core hyperthreaded CPU with 6 SPU's tacked on. The PS4 has an 8 core CPU

The PS3 has 256MB of RAM and 256MB of VRAM, the PS4 has 8 GB of unified ram, 16X as much.

The PS4 is a great a leap over the PS3 as the PS2 was over the PS1 or the PS3 over the PS2.

Comment Re:Really bad game to use for this comparison. (Score 1) 210

shoving it out the door, and telling the PC community to just throw more hardware at it.

Hasn't that been standard procedure for ALL PC games, not just the ports? And now that we've got developers who were formerly x86-Windows only doing console games, they're doing the same thing to we console gamers.

Slashdot Top Deals

HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!

Working...