even the otherwise very conservative Catholic church has no problem with evolution or the big bang.
Indeed. The so-called Big Bang theory was the work of a Catholic Priest, Monseigneur Georges Lemaitre. In response he was elected as member of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences, eventually becoming its president.
That if somebody is being an asshole, I then tell him "Do that one more time, and I'll punch you in the nose."
Then you're the one committing the assault, not him. (In the rest of your example he's committing murder, but you're still the assaulter.)
I've worked for big companies, and for startups. I have to say that on-campus dining facilities are pretty standard for big companies. We normally call them "cafeterias" but if you want to call it a restaurant knock yourself out.
Not to mention that Google's in-house chefs are a thing of legend. I really don't see what's news here.
Not to diminish his part in the Enigma saga, but the Poles were reading it long before any other nation.
I'm pretty sure the Germans were reading it before the Poles.
(Note to mods: this is "-1 Lame Joke", not "-1 Pedantic"
It's nice to see real Engineers getting a bit of recognition for a change.
On Slashdot.
No. In the Seattle Times. Like most stories on
How do you pronounce a name like that?
I hate to feed a troll, but there's three schools of thought here:
If it's that important, why not just have uniforms?
In a way, they do have uniforms. The uniform is the method of dress spelled out in the dress code.Their uniform just has more variation allowed.
But what would uniforms save? You still need to tell people how to wear them. The US Air Force spends about 160 pages (annoying PDF) telling people how to wear theirs.
Ok, let's get one thing straight -- the Cylons "evolving" into human form was not "mind blowing". It just wasn't.
Agreed. it wasn't even new to the Galactica canon. We first see human looking cylons in "The Night the Cyclons Landed" two-parter (aka "the halloween episode" with a special Wolfman Jack appearance) of Galactica 1980.
So really, the first picture of a human was porn, and not the picture in this article? That's awesome!
No. You made the mistake of reading the summary and thinking that somehow reflected what the fine article said. It's a common mistake here. If you actually take the time to read the rather brief article itself, you will find that the first photo of a human was in 1838.
Who could have guessed that the Germans would pass through impassable terrain and precisely hit the single weak point between the strong Maginot Line and the first-string armies in Belgium?
The Germans, it seems, had no trouble guessing it at all.
399 images included the location of the camera at the time the image was taken, and 102 images included the name of the photographer.
Or, to summarize from the other point of view...
"97.4% of images did not include the location of the camera at the time the image was taken, and 99.3% of images did not include the name of the photographer.
Charge for extra service for the offending 3%.
"Offending"?
If someone buys "UNLIMITED" (all caps to match marketing material) access, shouldn't they be entitled to UNLIMITED (all caps to match marketing material) usage without being considered "offending"? That's like saying my family uses too much milk because we drink the full gallon instead of letting it go bad.
I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning. -- Plato
