Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Get into manufacturing (Score 1) 335

Sounds cool!

Maybe "insults" was poor word choice. It's just kinda strange to see people with strong math skills get sucked into doing stuff for Wall Street when the system is clearly rigged not in your favor. Rather than something, you know, useful to everyone. And then the rest of us are just stuck with 401k savings plans (if we're even that lucky) that we can't really do anything else with, other than play the market and hope someone doesn't screw it all up for us (even though that's exactly what everyone else on the market is there to do).

Yeah, I did have a good "accounting for engineers" class for my MS degree, it was easily more interesting than the other systems classes. Was taught by a brilliant Arthur Anderson guy who was laid off after the Enron scandal, ironically enough. Didn't cover much of the stock market, of course.

Anyways, just hold onto your butts for the next crash, I guess.

Comment Re:And OP is retarded. (Score 1) 335

Thanks.. I'm sorta at a point in my life where all of those are actually options that are available to me, and I sorta have lower time commitments to my employer & family and a workshop area to start tinkering with some of that on the side.

I'm not at the point where I can actually start using any of my 401k savings towards any of that, though. Supposedly I have an OK but still somewhat aggressive portfolio, but I try to ignore it and let the fund managers do their thing until I see stories like this that remind us that, yes, we're due for another bubble bursting soon, and it could well be some combination of tech/realty/edu loans/energy or even something we don't expect to all come tumbling down.

Comment Re:And OP is retarded. (Score 4, Interesting) 335

All those things used to be "the conventional wisdom", but nowadays all of those things have been proven to be quite volatile.

I never believed in "making money from money"... I guess that's called "financial engineering" nowadays? That kinda insults me as an engineer, since we generally abide by physical laws. With financial laws, you're pretty much playing games using other people's rules. Other people who profess to love money above all else, and play the game to generate more money out of "nothing", and if you would just give them some of your money to play with, they'll help you "grow" your money too for a cut of the "take". But they don't add any value to the economy... they "multiply" it. And then they can just take "a little bit off the top", because no one will notice.

I'd love to invest in actual production... you know, things that add value and subtract costs instead of just "multiply" monopoly money. What options are there for that kind of thing?

Comment Re:Seriously? (Score 2) 121

And the best quote from the Ars comment section was "Darth Vader" is pretty much a Germanic version of "Dark Father"... so for all of Lucas's failings, that " I am your father" moment that the paper is largely based on was likely not one of the serendipitous ones that the paper hopes it to be.

"Han shot first", OTOH, we see cropping up in law ALL THE TIME.

Submission + - Home IoT devices: Legit Business Or Next Tech Bubble Fail?

dkatana writes: With the promise of 60 billion connected devices by 2020 many start-ups are developing endless new home connected devices, from smart forks, to "fart" detectors and smart cushions. Many are successfully reaching their initial funding goals.

But consumers are not convinced, and most devices raise many questions about privacy, usability and convenience. Do we really want every aspect of our lives managed by apps in our smartphone? Are we creating a new "bubble" out of IoT?

Some people would like to buy a connected toothbrush or a smart toilet, but most will think twice before letting all this IoT avalanche running their entire house.

Submission + - Feds order Amtrak to turn on system that would've prevented crash that killed 8 (trains.com)

McGruber writes: Last Tuesday evening, northbound Amtrak Northeast Regional train No. 188 derailed on a curve in Philadelphia, killing eight passengers. The train was traveling in excess of 100 mph, while the curve had a passenger-train speed limit of 50 mph.

In response, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is issuing formal emergency orders that will require Amtrak to make sure automatic train control systems work *NORTHBOUND* through Philadelphia at and near the site of the derailment. The FRA is also requiring that Amtrak assess the risk of all curves along the NEC and increase the amount and frequency of speed limit signs along the railroad.
(http://trn.trains.com/news/news-wire/2015/05/fra-to-issue-emergency-orders-for-amtrak-operations-in-northeast-corridor)

FRA's emergency order is newsworthy because Amtrak's existing signal system could have been configured to prevent a train from exceeding speed limits, according to the Wall Street Journal (http://www.wsj.com/articles/amtrak-crash-might-have-been-avoided-by-tweak-to-signal-system-1431622980). The newspaper reports that people familiar with Amtrak’s signal system said speed-control measures used elsewhere by the railroad could have prevented Tuesday’s crash. Amtrak officials said they were concerned enough about the curve to install the added protection on the two *SOUTHBOUND* tracks. But it wasn’t installed on the *NORTHBOUND* side because officials didn’t believe the tracks leading to the curve would allow trains to build up enough speed to topple over.

“It would have prevented the accident if it was operational,” National Transportation Safety Board member Robert Sumwalt said Thursday in an interview.

Interestingly, Amtrak President and Chief Executive Officer Joseph H. Boardman was head of the FRA before taking the reins at Amtrak. (http://www.amtrak.com/servlet/ContentServer?c=Page&pagename=am%2FLayout&cid=1251623383973)

Submission + - Kim Dotcom calls Hillary Clinton an 'adversary' of Internet freedom (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader writes: CNET reports, "Kim Dotcom ... says he views Hillary Clinton as an enemy of online freedom. ..... The subject of Clinton's candidacy came up when Dotcom was asked about a tweet he sent last year in which he said he called himself "Hillary's worse nightmare in 2016." He revisited that statement ... saying that Wikileaks founder Julian Assange would probably be a bigger headache for Clinton. "I'm aware of some of the things that are going to be roadblocks for her," he said, declining to be more specific. He said he hoped to provide some transparency and hoped to expand the influence of the Internet Party, the political party he is hoping to bring to the US." Breitbart adds, "As for why Kim and Assange might feel antipathy toward Hillary, Kim explained, “Hillary hates Julian she’s just an adversary of, I think, internet freedom.” A conflict between Assange and Clinton may have plenty of personal motivations, but it also seems inevitable in some sense. Hillary is obsessive about maintaining control of information. She created a personal server located in her home to handle all of her emails as Secretary of State, something no other Secretary has ever done. She then deleted all the contents of that server after self-selecting the emails she believed were work-related. More recently, she has refused to speak to the press for more than three weeks, even as she runs for President. By contrast, Assange has made a career out of parceling out what was once secret information. "

Submission + - Schools That Ban Mobile Phones See Better Academic Results

HughPickens.com writes: Jamie Doward reports at The Guardian that according to a recent study in the UK, the effect of banning mobile phones from school premises adds up to the equivalent of an extra week’s schooling over a pupil’s academic year with the test scores of students aged 16 improved by 6.4% after schools banned mobile phones, “We found that not only did student achievement improve, but also that low-achieving and low-income students gained the most. We found the impact of banning phones for these students was equivalent to an additional hour a week in school, or to increasing the school year by five days." In the UK, more than 90% of teenagers own a mobile phone; in the US, just under three quarters have one. In a survey conducted in 2001, no school banned mobiles. By 2007, this had risen to 50%, and by 2012 some 98% of schools either did not allow phones on school premises or required them to be handed in at the beginning of the day. But some schools are starting to allow limited use of the devices. New York mayor Bill de Blasio has lifted a 10-year ban on phones on school premises, with the city’s chancellor of schools stating that it would reduce inequality.

The research was carried out at Birmingham, London, Leicester and Manchester schools before and after bans were introduced (PDF). It factored in characteristics such as gender, eligibility for free school meals, special educational needs status and prior educational attainment. “Technological advancements are commonly viewed as increasing productivity,” write Louis-Philippe Beland and Richard Murphy. “Modern technology is used in the classroom to engage students and improve performance. There are, however, potential drawbacks as well, as they could lead to distractions.”

Comment Re:Affirmative Action (Score 1) 529

And I will say the same "Fuck You!" to those who say that "Affirmative Action" is still needed

Well haven't you heard? The American University is a place where Russian professors teach Chinese students.

(As an ironic aside, most martial arts studios in my area are where American masters teach Chinese martial arts to Russians)

Last I checked, Russia still has plenty of quotas on how many Jews are allowed in each of their universities. Otherwise the Jews would totally take over. Fortunately, Jews are welcome to emigrate to Israel or the US and enter decent universities there. Try doing that as a black or hispanic.

When will America grow up?

In Japan, in Korea, in China they do not have AA --- and their economies are growing leaps and bounds and everybody can attest to their technological achievements

America is somewhat ... different from the rest of the world, even compared to Western Europe. Diversity is not a bad thing. Lack of diversity has certainly provided its share of problems throughout history, though.

Harvard (and other Ivy League colleges) has a reputation for generating a fair amount of lawyers, politicians, doctors, etc. What do you think would happen if all of the people with positions in charge of a multinational country were all, say for the sake of argument, "white men"?

Comment Re:hardly surprising (Score 2) 649

That sounds like the "country mouse" / "city mouse" view. I agree that to a country mouse, the vast majority of what the government does with your tax dollars looks like a pointless waste. Cities have quite different problems on a different scale than what independent rural societies deal with. I'm quite comfortable to admit that there are people much smarter than me working on those problems with my tax dollars, even if once in a while there are reports of corruption which was appropriately handled by some oversight committee.

I did grow up in the DC metro area and worked for the defense industrial complex across the street from the Pentagon, wining and dining with DoD officers and the occasional congressman. I also have a lot of friends from HS doing social work in the surrounding area. Let me tell you sometime about which group has become dependent on the government and is enjoying the lavish lifestyle at the expense of everyone else, it might not be very obvious to you.

Mad props to the conservatives for realizing that yes, people lie, cheat, and steal, and shouldn't be trusted with their money. But most liberals I know believe in The System and want government to work and do the best they can in whatever position they have to make it work. And I kinda know which world I'd rather live in, even if there is some amount of corruption overhead.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...