Let's see, we can either sue somebody, or use the helpful selection screen to change our privacy settings back to the way they were.
Facebook has removed the ability for users to opt out of publicly sharing certain information, including their profile photo, networks, and sex. I have every privacy setting set to "Friends Only" or "Friends of Friends," but those things are still publicly viewable in my profile.
Who on earth thinks drinking coffee while driving could ever be a good idea?
How do you change gear?
I applaud this law.
When you're in the car driving, that's what you should do, drive. *Not* eat sandwiches, drink coffee, play computer games, telephone, etc. etc. Doing so not only puts your stupid life at risk but mine as well.
Ever heard of automatic transmissions?
When I passed my test, the first thing I did was drive on a motorway and light up a cigarette. Only to hear a loud horn and realise I was drifting into the other lane. I understand this could have been fatal and this has helped me realise the seriousness of doing ANYTHING whilst driving. Since then I avoid smoking and driving. Although I don't agree, maybe smoking and changing radio stations should be tested too (if so many people do this anyway)?
I'd argue that your near accident probably had more to do with the fact that you were a new driver than the act of lighting a cigarette. As many people have already mentioned, experience is an important part of being a safe driver, regardless of "distractions."
example steam problems:
1:steam policy: no refunds. I bought batman:AA and it *sucked* to me. Nice idea, achievables make it crap for me, my own personal opinion. I decided this within an hour of playtime (download took me 2 hours, fast connection). No refund.
Almost no retailers will give you a refund for a PC game that you've already opened. Nice attempt at a strawman, though.
You're not only putting your concentration it, but changing your view from the street to the phone screen.
Not if you can touch-type and have a QWERTY keyboard on your phone!
We need a clear, unambiguous policy that nukes are absolutely forbidden for every state with no double standards.
It's a lose-lose situation. Sure, the double-standard argument is true, but that's only half of it. If the US or another world power were to actually disarm completely, how long do you think it would take for some dictator or terrorist group to take advantage of that opportunity? When mutually assured destruction is no longer an issue, we'll have the most to worry about. The only exception, of course, would be if we had some way to determine, with 100% certainty, that no nuclear weapons were possessed by anyone, and I don't think that's going to happen.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.
