Whore yourself out much??????
Never. Why?
This.
Fuck the device, the browser should behave properly. If it doesn't, too fucking bad.
I am so fucking sick of the Android browser deciding I should or should not be able to zoom on certain pages, deciding to reflow content based on my orientation, etc.
And i absolutely fucking hate sites that do not respect my preference of seeing the real site instead of the shitty mobile version.
That's rubbish. Most of the major platforms have had Java ported to them. Including various obscure systems is ludicrous. If I want a program that I'm almost guaranteed will run without recompile on Linux, Windows, BSD and even many mainframes, then Java remains the best solution. I'm not saying, from a programming perspective, that it's all that great, but from a platform neutral perspective for most of the systems that a programmer will encounter, it remains the best.
Have fun running an x86-64 Linux binary natively on a Windows 8 machine. I can. however, write a Java program that I can almost guarantee will in fact run on x64 Linux or Windows.
And how long did it take to get your children to know the difference between right and wrong* and think on their own. For quite a few years, a child's brain isn't wired to understand certain things. I'm pretty bright, and I didn't understand money that wasn't coins and bills until after I wouldn't have been tempted by Smurfberries anyway.
*You do realize that highly intelligent people have debated the difference for centuries. I doubt your children are that much smarter than all the philosophers.
Is a C++ parser that much harder to write than a C parser? The reasons C++ parsers are a pain is largely for the same reasons C parsers are a pain. There's more stuff C++ has to parse, but as long as that's fairly regular it shouldn't make the parsing much harder.
So we'll have more programmers who don't get why buffer overflows are bad.
In other words, nothing will change.
Yay for job security!
A problem shared is a problem halved?
n^2*(number of browser versions)
I don't know about your CS courses. Ours here pretty much expect you to KNOW programming if you want to have a snowball-in-hell chance to graduate.
So I guess the pay for that extra hour you had to work because your boss made you will go to your insurance company...
Of course, provided that he paid you for it in the first place. Else you not only lose time but also money.
The question today ain't so much whether you're paranoid, it's more whether you're paranoid enough.
I mean, think about it. Ponder that you told someone in 1999 that all our email traffic is monitored by the government, that they log and examine every bit you do on the internet, that they use your cell phone to track your every move and that they basically log, store, monitor and evaluate every kind of communication you do, be it via phone or internet, and that they track what you read, who you talk to, what you talk about and what information you access.
Personally, I'd have asked you whether you want to buy a new tinfoil hat, now with even better anti-government shielding.
Today, I'd ponder buying one.
Well, you have to admit, we have every right to.
Technology used to be what sets us free, what allows us to go where nobody went before, to soar and climb to new heights, to liberate ourselves and our dreams.
Today, technology is just a tool for oppression and control, to monitor and to invade our privacy. What we loved has turned into what we hate.
Isn't that enough to make someone cry?
Smart kids discount the value of experience. Average adults discount the value of being smart.
Long-standing problems can have simple solutions. However, the solutions will look like dumb ideas at first, since if they looked like good ideas people would have found them by now.
The Republicans will probably be split right down the middle between the religious nutjobs and the other nuts that want to implant it into poor people to keep them from breeding.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.
