Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Submission + - "Canvas Fingerprinting" Online Tracking Difficult To Block (propublica.org)

globaljustin writes: First documented in a forthcoming paper by researchers at Princeton University and KU Leuven University in Belgium, this type of tracking, called canvas fingerprinting, works by instructing the visitor’s Web browser to draw a hidden image. Because each computer draws the image slightly differently, the images can be used to assign each user’s device a number that uniquely identifies it.

[The] fingerprints are unusually hard to block: They can’t be prevented by using standard Web browser privacy settings or using anti-tracking tools such as AdBlock Plus.

The researchers found canvas fingerprinting computer code, primarily written by a company called AddThis, on 5 percent of the top 100,000 websites.

Submission + - A new form of tracking (kuleuven.be)

bnortman writes: The article at https://securehomes.esat.kuleu... discusses a new form of user fingerprinting and tracking for the internet using HTML 5 Canvas features. I'm assuming this need to draw and image and then send that image back to the source site. Can an added in for a browser detect this logic in the java scripts and stop it from sending?

Comment protesting downmods (Score 1, Funny) 192

some crooked fsker went and downmodded all my responses

***i protest these downmods b/c they are not deserved***

my posts have always been on topic, IMHO interesting, and at least involves direct clash of ideas

I WAS DOWNMODDED FOR PERSONAL/POLITICAL REASONS NOT BECAUSE OF MY IDEAS BEING WRONG

cowards show yourselves, and explain as an AC or GTFO

Comment Wal-Mart are cheating criminals (Score 1) 192

Wal-Mart is a know exploiter of labor & is roundly hated for their business practices

the fact that you somehow idealize their outsourcing of small town America indicates further discussion with you will be unfruitful

Watch this documentary to start educating yourself: Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price (2005)

Comment i can explain... (Score 0) 192

my original comment, and the point of this thread is not to explain every shitty film/book franchise out there

there's taste, personal preference, etc...

but what I *can* explain is why the idea that "print is dead" and TFA's assertions about why are dumb and wrong.

it's bad business decisions made from the managers who think their job is to hit abstract "numbers" instead of facilitate their talent

*that's what i can explain*

Comment another transformers film? (Score 0) 192

There ARE 'other' options available that man people say are much better.

tell me, what other Transformers remakes are out there?

but that's parenthetical (you and I both know there isn't one)

my *original main point* was that TFA's diagnosis is just dead wrong

a certain number of people are "sheeple" yes...but that does not prove TFA's assertions ***AT ALL***

just because **some** people will watch "whatever is on" doesn't mean that they wouldn't choose a better option, when put in front of them

Comment false choice (Score 0) 192

I responded to another person like you, but since you mentioned TRANSFORMERS...

The first Transformers movie made $700 million. "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" made $830 million, "Transformers: Dark of the Moon" grossed over a billion dollars and "Transformers: Age of Extinction" is 75% there after two weeks. Reality disagrees with you.

that proves my point, actually

Transformers remakes are shit

they grossed alot of money

that ****does not prove you right****

because there is ***NO CHOICE***

moviegoers couldn't choose between different versions of the remake...you are taking a false choice and twisting it to prove a non-existent point

if they want to see Transformers with updated special effects, there is only one option...seeing the ones with horrible writing

also, we're several iterations into this now...people have been conditioned to accept lower quality by artificial scarcity

lastly, it doesn't matter that some people will watch anything...YES...I admit that is a true fact

just because people will watch whatever shit gets most marketing doesn't mean that they wouldn't ***choose a better option if they had one***

you logic is backwards...by your logic, a zoo animal *must* like their food because they eat all of it...forget the fact that *it's all the food they get*

Comment Wal-Mart proves you wrong (Score 1) 192

A problem is that this market isn't especially large nor lucrative.

you are believing the marketing...you are accepting *their* framing of the situation

it is a false choice...many excellent films are also hugely popular **when they get the marketing push**

producing shitty movies still costs alot of money, ex: ***TRANSFORMERS SERIES***

end of discussion

The big money is in mediocre crap. Always has been.

absolutely hook line and sinker...you are part of the problem

YES...people often just want to be distracted...busy people working hard dont have time to curate their entertainment like some of us

THAT DOES NOT MEAN YOU ARE RIGHT

just because people will accept the best of what is available doesnt mean that ***if they had a choice*** they wouldn't choose the better option

your point is like saying "People go to Wal-Mart...it's hugely popular...that proves that people would rather have a cheap chinese made bicycle rather than a US made one"

Wal-Mart gets all the customers not because of quality, but because of *******ARTIFICIAL SCARCITY IN THE MARKET*********

it's an engineered lack of options...it's obvious and you are a dupe for not seeing it

Comment "the market" = biz managers (Score 5, Insightful) 192

the whole "print is dead" meme is a myth

people want relevant, accurate news more than ever

people want entertainment that is not formulaic & trite more than ever

the ***ONY*** reasons authors, musicians, journalists and other "content creators" are suffering is because of:

***bad business management of the companies they work for***

these unscrupulous business managers are trained to understand "business" and "profit" as ONLY SHORT TERM METRICS that are abstracted into more "numbers" that they have to "hit"

it's based on the **incorrect** concept that people don't care if their journalism, art, music is quality or not...they cynically assume that people will watch whatever is on TV, read whatver books are put in front of them, and listen to trite, predictable music indefinitely

ITS NOT TRUE

people want variety, they notice repetition...

the only reason is that we, as consumers, have been conditioned by bullshit marketing to have ***REDUCED EXPECTATIONS OF VALUE***

this is a hoodwink, plain and simple

Comment more of why it starts w/ symbols (Score 1) 241

it starts with symbols...then goes to 'logic'...then math/code/language

here's one way we can know this is true (besides using the SMCR model)...

it mirrors human development

humans use symbols before we know what they mean...before we can use **logic** to manipulate symbols in real time to get what we want (aka talking/writing)

we first mimic the symbols around us like a parrot...we just repeat what we hear

then we **associate** symbols with things...

that association allows for us to use logic...logic tells us what symbols result in what actions around us

***THEN*** we choose from all symbol systems available to us the best for the situation...

that's your answer to TFA

Comment or Communications: SMCR model (Score 1) 241

The problem with all the articles like this is that they're either written by people who did take math or didn't

right...and that biases them...same for the coders as you say...

what no one considers is what the Communications people have to say...

see...Communications Theory (as taught today...i'd know...used to teach it as adjunct in grad school) starts with Claude Shannon and his SMCR model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...

sure, there is tons of 'soft science' but there is something relevant here: SYMBOLS

it really goes like this:

symbols:logic:math/programming/writtenlanguage

math/code/written language are all on the same "hierarchy" level...then branch according to ****USAGE FUNCTION**** (I hate that TFA uses that ontology!!!!)

all math, all code...it's ALL SYMBOLS...and, from a cybernetic perspective, they can all be grouped together when trying to answer questions that TFA poses

Comment Re:different than prostetic hand (Score 1) 77

Because they can clearly only use one or the other.

yeah I thought the same...

if i was missing a hand, I'd definitely want to try this out in tandem with my prostetic hand

this is a great area to be in, for my money...you get to work with the latest BCI crap and robotics AND directly improve people's lives in a tangible way

Comment different than prostetic hand (Score 2) 77

wow...

first of all, I can criticize the concept and design all I want...it's not rude or offensive towards disabled people to demand *better* design at all...

missing one hand after an accident?

your (trolling) criticism is also factually incorrect....TFA isn't a prostetic hand to replace an injured limb...this is expressly intended to be an addition to the main 'hand' so anyone might use it

my point was/is that robotics is only limited by the power source and material strength now, and all these (really expensive) hype-generating projects is not progressing science...it's just rearranging of tinker toys, b/c we have different limits now...we have the BCI interface perfected enough to start using for this stuff...the design ideas are there...now its just a question of power/material strength...i'd like to see research and hype directed in that area

Slashdot Top Deals

Love may laugh at locksmiths, but he has a profound respect for money bags. -- Sidney Paternoster, "The Folly of the Wise"

Working...