"I do not think anyone has ever sold as an analysis of writing a unique identifier. But it can be useful. If one was an unpublished author in any way, and then is Unabomber, "and began to write letters as a calling card, can be deduced from very similar writing styles and structures of work and unpublished incriminating / unpopularized previous evidence that at least raise the suspicion that the writer of the earlier work was somehow tied to the crimes, though not directly. Of course, all bets are off if it is possible that someone could have analyzed previously the author to imitate. Also of note, this is only one positive test (ie, a mismatch in the analysis is not intended at all as to whether someone wrote it). I would be a good example of writing that demonstrates a language used only in a particular location, a business in which the term is used only one enterprise, and an ideological term used only in a certain political stripe movement. * * This is reasonable evidence of authorship, which, of course, tests! = Test. The polygraph, on the other hand, is complete BS because the only real thing is a polygraph achieves the beneficial psychological reasons to tell the truth because of the "faith" in the fact that they lie for outt by the device. Not really measure anything related to the statements, only the physiological condition that may depend upon millions of independent factors."
If going unabomer you could always bounce it through a translator as I did with your post. Of course you could end up with quite a bit of "Someone set us up the bomb!" But still semi-legible. I wonder how the analysis would do with that?
