Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Took you long enough, Slashdot (Score 1) 392

To publish an insanely sensationalistic FUD piece from the Anti-Nuclear crowd scaremongering the most densely populated area of the world over something that is a complete and utter non-issue.

Not that your point isn't well taken, but either you're using a different definition of "world" or "density," or something happened to Japan, Mexico, South Korea and India (and possibly the Philippines) since this morning that hasn't been making the news.

Comment Re:tagging is fine (Score 1) 201

Well, see, in countries where there's decent privacy laws, it's illegal to take a picture of somebody where that person is the subject of the photo, and then to publish that photo without their permission.

Wish I could vote you up, sir. People don't understand that posting photos to facebook is publishing, and that they should be subjected to the same restrictions placed on professionals.

Comment Re:What do you expect? (Score 1) 470

The problem was that IE had a 95% share of the market, so developers thought they could get away with developing web applications that would work only on IE 6 for Windows. And, of course, they did.

I'd blame it more on the breed of "VB 6 for dummies" "developers" that also emerged around that time, that had no clue what a mess they were making.

Comment Re:Put this on the list (Score 1) 357

It's not about posting their own idiocy on the internet themselves. It's about others doing it without your consent. You know the people I'm talking about, the ones who refuse to put the camera away at a party, when everyone has had a little too much to drink, and then at first chance post them to facebook and tag everyone they can. Where's the "Allow people to tag me in photos" privacy option?

Comment Re:Idiotic Summary (Score 1) 325

. In fact, they're rather famous for not allowing you to do what you want with your phone. It took new rules to allow unlocking, for instance

None of my previous phones, besides a Blackberry, allowed you to do much of anything, and worse, the providers locked them down to the point that they were practically useless even if software was available for them. It took specialized software to unlock them just to install apps, or prevent annoying "trust this app" prompts. Apple seems a step ahead to me, or they did at that point in time.

Comment Re:5.5? Feh! (Score 2, Interesting) 560

What a bunch of wimps. Here in southern California, a mere 5.5 would hardly even arouse anyone's interest. Probably make page 1 of the local section unless the Padres made a big trade; then it would be relegated to page 2.

Wimps?

2" of snow would make you cry for weeks. In Ottawa, we finally caved in and cheered for an extra 6" so we could break the 170" record only a few years ago. It's all about what you're accustomed to.

Submission + - Employee pay statements exposed to internet

An anonymous reader writes: ADP (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_Data_Processing) apparently offers client companies the option of providing employee pay statements online, and not mailing paper statements. My company jumped on the bandwagon. Website (http://my.adp.ca) claims to be IE-only, windows-only, and adobe-only, and looks about as secure as you're average early-nineties, in-house developed 'secure' website. Looks like it'll work in firefox on linux, haven't tried yet. To be clear, I'm not -opposed- to having it available online; I know the technology exists to do it securely. I am opposed to them doing it, as I wouldn't trust them to manage a good crap without written instructions and a personal coach.

Slashdot Top Deals

2.4 statute miles of surgical tubing at Yale U. = 1 I.V.League

Working...