That's my point, with the caveat that its not really censorship since the goal is not to silence anyone but to investigate a crime.
Unless, of course, the intent of the effort was to silence the researcher in question. Then it is.
Again, all I'm saying is that its premature to claim censorship. As I said in the beginning all we can say for sure at this point is that it was rude to seize the equipment without asking for cooperation. Facts and opinions may change as more info unfolds.
But a kind of rudeness that routinely shows up when authorities want to make an example of someone.
Might be standard procedure to seize evidence without warning to prevent tampering.
It also might be standard procedure to cause as much grief as possible when someone gets inconvenient to the powers-that-be. What more could they be doing to this guy given their current powers?