According to records, Nokia did about $4B in business in India in 2010 and 2011, but saw 2012 revenue fall about 23%. Still, that's a fairly large chunk of change. If their business from 2006 - 2010 was strong as well, I guess it's possible that the company owes about $3.4B in tax over that time period.

Thing is, they'd have had to be basically paying no tax at all to rack up that kind of bill. And since we can assume Nokia isn't stupid, it seems a lot more like a shakedown.

There is no perfect solution here. I'm not saying companies should erect wind turbines in the middle of nesting areas, but the truth is, there is no risk-free, cost-free, environmental-damage-free answer to the problem of power production. Coal mining is wretched for the environment and coal miners have a nasty habit of dying of black lung. Nuclear power has risks (and I'm a nuclear proponent). The long-term cleanup and environmental repair is very costly if something goes wrong. Solar power is expensive. Wind turbines kill birds.

At a certain point, the question is "What's an acceptable loss ratio?"

The blog post states: "You might object to these numbers because the usage of the drives is different. The enterprise drives are used heavily. The consumer drives are in continual use storing users’ updated files and they are up and running all the time, but the usage is lighter. "

That invalidates the conclusion they're drawing. You can't put two different types of drives under different workloads and then conclude they fail at the same rate. The fact that other studies have reached similar conclusions (Google published one a few years back) is irrelevant when it comes to evaluating whether or not *this* study has measured what it seeks to measure.

Consumer drives and enterprise drives may fail at equal rates, but using different workloads doesn't help us reach that conclusion.

Bitcoin mining on anything but ASICs is no longer profitable. Even on an R9 290X with an 80+ Platinum PSU, you're making maybe $1 - $2 a day. And the vast majority of people don't have anything like that equipment. CPU mining is so slow, you'll never complete any work before the block is finished. GPU mining is still fast enough to get some work done, provided you own an AMD GPU.

But Nvidia GPUs don't mine BTC for beans and most mining kernels will crash an NV card or lead to rampant slowdowns and random lockups. Even an AMD card needs a low priority miner to escape the kind of UI chokeup that immediately alerts someone to a problem in the system. This might have made sense in 2010, when CPUs could still mine, but these days the return on investment is going to be terrible -- and the performance hit is big enough that people *will* notice.