Comment Re:Droughts = Cold (Score 1) 279
Your question makes absolutely no sense, can you clarify it?
Your question makes absolutely no sense, can you clarify it?
A public university does not have to support all forms of speech. When you go to that school you typically sign a document stating you will limit your behavious to a set appropriate of being in that institution, a code of conduct, and that is legally enforceable. You could say that like the military you sign away some of your rights when you go the school for the duration of time you are in the school.
Or creating strawmen, right?
Actually it was conservatives who coined the phrase climate change, particularly Frank Luntz.
When was the coldest February on record? Oh, you mean coldest for a small group of cities, not any particular state, region, country or the planet....However you have to also realize it was the hottest February on record for about the same number of cities on the west coast. So again, it is weather, not climate, you illiterate.
Actually, that is not even remotely correct. Deserts, and droughts, in cali are caused by cold ocean currents that drive rain elsewhere and the rainshadow effect. It is an odd double wammy with 2 the 3 deserts causing effect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R...
It has nothing to do with global cooling, however warming does make it worse because warmer air can hold more mositure and thus takes longer to saturate to the point of rainfall.
The otehr cause of the deserts being the land is too far inland for the moisture to consistently make it there.
IT is 8 pages of regulations, 300+ of justification:
http://www.wired.com/2015/03/f...
Also it is the GOP holding up its release:
I would argue that they are only legally able to do that over limited spectrum communications, and therefore not the internet.
http://www.wired.com/2015/03/f...
But last week, three FCC Commissioners voted to saddle the internet with a new set of constraints so complex, vague and problematic that it took over 300 pages of explanation to justify eight pages of rules. While we haven’t seen the full text yet, we do know a lot about what’s inside.
Also it is apparently the GOP FCC members holding this up:
These rules prevent that. Without these rule that is possible, with these rules it is not possible. The ISPs are not allowed to slow down content or charge for faster delivery of content (same thing in practice) but they can still charge end users in a tiered manner.
It is not a matter of property rights, atleast not in most states. In most states the state, or local government own the property that this is done on.
The regulations are 8 pages worth. The 300 pages, that likes to be famously misquoted is for history, justification, outline of the public response period (legally required)
The pay for speed guidelines cover content providors, not end users. Also what is there to pay for?
you mean THESE rules, that have been available for quite some time now?:
I am sure it will be soon if not.
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer
