Comment Re:Be careful of the term "terrorist attack" (Score 1) 737
Being single (especially with a high-prestige job such as pilot), living with your parents *and* using a photo of yourself in San Francisco as your Facebook avatar....
Being single (especially with a high-prestige job such as pilot), living with your parents *and* using a photo of yourself in San Francisco as your Facebook avatar....
Well, he was gay so you can bet your last t-shirt that the media will drop the story pretty soon. (Can't say anything bad about them, even though both murder and suicide are pretty common in that community. It would lead to "prejudice", you know...)
See, you can have a media cover-up without a conspiracy, just wait a few days after the news-cycle has turned.
No, AFAIK the lock is active only for 5 minutes (according to other sources 20, doesn't make a difference).
In other words the guy inside the cockpit has to re-lock the door every 5 minutes to prevent somebody from entering.
If you have a business use for what they can print today, you already have one, and are likely contemplating buying a better one. If you have a personal use for the parts they can print, you probably already own one. And even if you don't have a real use for them, you may have one as a cool toy. But not everyone is going to buy the same toys as you.
Once they get a lot more capable (maybe not Star Trek replicator capable, but substantially better than they are now) then they'll become ubiquitous. Until then, not everyone needs one. I'm thanking you now for being an early adopter, but don't expect me to join you yet.
The problem is they're too limited. They have to get more capable, not faster, in order to meet my needs. If they can insert circuitry, maybe I can print things that are somewhat more useful. As of right now, I have needed exactly one 3D printed thing (a battery holder for an electronic project, which a friend provided gratis.) But at no point in the last five years have my needs for small plastic things added up to the $300 price of a Simplebot, let alone a printer with better quality, resolution, size, or capabilities.
Maybe you have kids who need thousands of plastic army men. Maybe you are in a business where fabricating prototypes is valuable to you. Great for you, I'm glad you have a use for one. Hopefully you'll help drive volume so the costs come down even further. But as they stand today, they're too expensive for anything I need, and would take up more storage space than I want to waste on a toy.
It has nothing to do with thinking big or small. I'm sorry you can't imagine a scenario different from your own experience.
How much havok will a 10 mph sign cause on the highway?
None at all. Drivers aren't that stupid, and still maintain enough control over their car to react appropriately.
You, however, might be so stupid that you'd slam on your own brakes to 10 MPH just to make another idiotic point, at which point you get rear-ended by an 18-wheeler who is unlucky enough to be following you. Fortunately, there is only one you, so the gene pool will be thinned out to the point where this situation won't repeat.
I simply don't need a bunch of small plastic tchotschkies, no matter how fast I can print them.
There's a big difference between uranium and a working hydrogen bomb. The US won't use nukes unless someone else detonates one first.
The system would be really awesome if could also maintain the proper distance from the car ahead of you.
Ford has had that for years now. It's called 'Adaptive Cruise Control', and uses radar to maintain a preset minimum following distance.
I have it on my 2011 Ford, and while it's nice, it can only be set to following distance, not time. I want to set it for a two second gap, but my choices are 22, 44, or 66 yards. It's too close for high speeds, but too long for low speeds.
(sorry, Dr. Ford, not Broad)
Devil's Advocate here, but maybe the reason is that all kinds of data is out in public, and some of it is likely flawed. Maybe there's a paper that theorized that you could set a Dewar's flask of liquid hydrogen next to an A-bomb to get an H-bomb. But Dr. Broad is a respected authority, and if he says "we did it this way" without mentioning the Dewar's flask idea, a rogue state would know what not to try.
Remember, these guys get about one shot to get their test explosion right, because in about an hour after a successful test of an H-bomb by anyone the US considers a threat the USAF is going to be raining actual working H-bombs on their entire nuclear program, with a few diverted to cover the presidential palace, the parliament, and essentially every researcher and civilian within a 20-km radius of the aforementioned targets. The US will not tolerate a new state of MAD with a new non-Western-approved government.
Remember that the bag's Zigbee radio is broadcasting the bag's location constantly in real time, whereas the child's embedded GPS transceiver is using an accelerometer to help predict when the child will zip across the roadway; plus the child's Wi-Fi chip, network path, etc., will all add latency. If that child's GPS receiver has lost signal due to interference, it's going to need to rely on inertial navigation and its own free-running clock to send the predictions of future locations to the car, and those might be out of sync, depending on how long the child has spent in the basement.
Oh, wait. Children aren't having embedded ADS-B chips surgically implanted yet? And random trash bags don't have Zigbee? Hasn't someone been thinking of the children?
Pretty much the same for me.
I tried to use Postgrest 2 years ago, but I could not get it to compile into a custom directory and decided that it's not worth the effort.
In the meantime I have written so many wrappers geared to MySQL that I will use it for many years to come. But I will certainly give Postgrest a try sometime in the future.
It's always the same. The realists come with real issues, real arguments and real examples.
The Microsoft apologists only say that it's "pretty damn good". That's it. No specifics, no reasons, no nothing. It's just that good, "honestly".
(un)paid advertizement:
I love to dump on Microsoft as much as the next guy, but honestly SQL Sever 2000 on is pretty damn good.
Now, if SQL server is "honestly" so good, why are the one million busiest sites slowly migrating away from Microsoft?
http://news.netcraft.com/archi...
In 2008, 20% of the million busiest websites used Microsoft, now only 12% do, and the decline slowly continues.
When we talk about these installations, we talk about very heavy loads, very much data and very high requirements on reliability and availability.
So why does the high-end "enterprise" systems move away from that "pretty damn good" platform? The Microsoft apologists on this thread constantly tell me who licensing costs don't matter and how good all Microsoft products are ("honestly"!) - but exactly in the one area where licensing costs really don't matter (the one million busiest sites) Microsoft is also losing it. So why then?
Maybe it's not as "pretty damn good" as some anonymous internet commentators claim? Honestly?
For God's sake, stop researching for a while and begin to think!