Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:THIS is the kind of thing that GamerGate is abo (Score 1) 474

So that made it ok to send out death threats and harass her? No one is arguing that she's a saint.

The original 'outrage' was that she slept with the reviewer, so why was all this directed at her, the reviewer was supposed to be the one breaking ethics, which is what things are clearly about, right?

Comment I'd just call it the stupid tax (Score 1) 474

Who in their right mind would buy a products sight unseen though? Just based on a few youtube videos?

That is just crazy!

At least with a car or new McD's sandwich there are some safety and health codes that the companies mostly adhere to, but with gaming there is nothing, not even Nintendo's Seal of Approval anymore.

Comment Publication embargoes are the norm everywhere (Score 1) 474

Publication embargoes are standard in just about every industry, hell even publicly funded research includes them so that journalists have time to prepare the story and then publish it at the same time.

Sorry, GG, if you've got this, and the fact that some people on youtube give favourable reviews to products they get for free then you really are not bringing anything new to light.

The fact that the more confident a company is in their product tends to translates into an earlier embargo release prior to product release date is nothing new. At all.

If you really want that pink version of a sword then go ahead and pre-order, but don't get outraged when the shipping product is a mess, it's a choice you make knowing the risks. Remember the mess that AC4 was? with floating ships and all that? Yeah, did you really think that the new version that's build on a moderately-new engine would turn out better?

Comment Time to go Rambo (Score 1) 698

Literally. It's Bow and Arrow time. Wouldn't it just be cheaper to mandate that school uniforms include bulletproof vests or something just slightly less crazy. Whatever happened to metal detectors at all entrances? --- On a slightly different note, the actual tech for detecting the shots is pretty cool, when used in its proper context.

Comment Re:Gender Intolerance is just another double stand (Score 1) 834

I think the people involved can distinguish between "omg I'm going to kill you fa**ot" and "I'm sitting on your steps with a knife at 123 Avenue Road waiting for your kids to come out" I have no idea what the actual threats were, but I really doubt that anyone involved would have gone to the police with only 'you suxxorz'.

Comment Re:Gendered Bigotry Against Men (Score 1) 834

You have valid points, but you didn't read the article... here is the appropriate bit...

Gendered bigotry against women is widely considered to be “in bounds” by Internet commenters (whether they openly acknowledge it or not), and subsequently a demographic that comprises half of the total human population has to worry about receiving rape threats, death threats, and the harassment of angry mobs simply for expressing their opinions. This needs to stop, and while it’s impossible to prevent all forms of harassment from occurring online, we can start by creating a culture that shames individuals who cross the bounds of decency.

We can start by stating the obvious: It is never appropriate to use slurs, metaphors, graphic negative imagery, or any other kind of language that plays on someone’s gender, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religion. Not only is such language inappropriate regardless of one’s passion on a given subject, but any valid arguments that existed independently of such rhetoric should have been initially presented without it. Once a poster crosses this line, they should lose all credibility.

Similarly, it is never acceptable to dox, harass, post nude pictures, or in any other way violate someone’s privacy due to disagreement with their opinions. While most people would probably agree with this in theory, far too many are willing to access and distribute this humiliating (and often illegal) content. Instead of simply viewing stories of doxing, slut-shaming, and other forms of online intimidation as an unfortunate by-product of the digital age, we should boycott all sites that publish these materials.

Comment GG CAN'T READ (Score 1) 834

If there's one thing I've learned about GG is that they just can't read..

abigsmurf: Journalists are covering GG death threat stuff, but they gave no sh*ts about Jack Thompson or the Penny Arcade guys, and were like 'yeah, they deserved it'
AmiMoJo: Strawman! No one is arguing that it's ok to threaten men.
serviscope_minor: It's not a strawman, its just plain bullsh*t. The threats against Thompson and Penny Arcade were not ignored, so abigsmurf's point just just made up.
you: oh, let me passive-agressively bring up Quin and Sarkeesian back into this.

What does this have to do with the discussion at hand? I though y'all were about ethics and not Quin And Sarkeesian, but here you are just dragging them back in for absolutely no reason.

Bonus points: someone writes an editorial article, so it must represent what all journalists are thinking right?

Comment Re:Trolled by Soulskill (Score 1) 834

That sounds like Leigh Alexander's Gamasutra article. If it is, you should re-read. It is not greatly written, no question, but it is not about gamers as a whole.

It's about the minor "realz gamerz broz" demographic that has fun doxxing people, is as offensive as possible on game chat (hello xbox live) etc etc. If anyone else had these kinds of fans (major sports for example) they would get put in their place quick, but because it's gaming its been overlooked so far. That is the point of the article.

Slashdot Top Deals

Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.

Working...