Comment Re:Doesn't this pretty much kill 4chan? (Score 1) 134
What is the legal status for hosting a server with illegal information on it?
If they don't know, then they are not responsible. It's in the DMCA, or possibly the CFAA.
What is the legal status for hosting a server with illegal information on it?
If they don't know, then they are not responsible. It's in the DMCA, or possibly the CFAA.
That NSA and GCHQ are able to monitor 4Chan and track who the "anonymous" posters are?
These game changing big events are well beyond any FEMA planning.
Planning or not, FEMA will always do a Heck of a Job
Give me an editable path bar I can enable
Command+Tab > Tab to Finder / Command + SHIFT + G
as my History professors and English professors were.
Umm. I'm pretty sure it's open source.
Or Congress, which has oversight authority.
Sounds like the obvious answer is "Then don't watch it."
People such as yourself who tell people to just give something up if they don't like a particular issue with it are fucking morons. The world is not made of absolutes, nothing is perfect and companies are out to make a profit off the back of the consumer.
And if you had any actual capacity for thought in that little numbnut that rattles around in that cranial cavity of yours, you'd have realized that that bit about "consumers will govern companies in the market place" is antiquated 19th century BULLSHIT that no longer has any merit.
Companies no longer need to care about the consumer, when they have so many different ways of obtaining revenue without having to rely upon the pennies you have to offer. And it's a well known fact that the most PROFITABLE companies are the most HATED by consumers. Companies like Comcast are laughing all the way to the bank. Seems pissing all over consumers pays quite well.
You think ticket sales amounts to fuck-all compared to all the Licensing and Merchandising fees the NFL takes in every year? Fact is there is not a single Public Company that you can control with your little fist full of pocket change. And the only thing consumers hurt by giving up services for things they actually enjoy over idealistic bullshit is themselves -- not the corporate target of their ire.
Just like 2013,...,1995 (when I first installed RedHat 2 from a CD)
As good as any other theory, I guess.
Furthermore, we don't even know how the regular, massive swings in global temperature happen.
And this is what pisses me off with the climate "skeptics". If you don't know how the system will react when you're increasing the concentration of CO2 then why not err on the side of mitigating the CO2 concentrations instead of "business as usual".
what Panama is to the US, then fine, go for it.
Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall