Did anyone look at this? Sources? I looked at the recent section and didn't see this.
BUT the related submission below the story, which seems to have been submitted by the same person seems to have a link to a story, which has a link to a source.
I'm guessing the submitter screwed up his first submission and resubmitted it, then Unknown Lamer screwed up and picked the wrong submission.
Everyone has seen dozens of these boards being promoted by trolls who have some sort of crazy idea why the raspberry pi is bad. I've seen this board before, but last time i checked it wasn't ready, where as the raspberry pi was. It doesn't address all of the concerns of the referenced story. Linking to that previous story makes your current submission look trollish.
That said, this is actually the best of the mentioned alternatives. Most suggested alternatives to the raspberry pi use a allwinner a10(bga chip) and don't come with gerbers. This one uses an allwinner a13 which is qfp and can be hand soldered.
So your main problems with getting this accepted are probably that the trolls have already worn out everyones patience, and that the raspberry pi already came out. If you had a better angle than the raspberry pi bad, this board good, you'd probably have a better chance at getting it accepted. Once again, just to be clear, trying to compete/compare with the pi is going to be a problem.
Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker