Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Nice advertisement (Score 4, Insightful) 169

Normal users don't test all cases of a game.

Maybe not, but as soon as you tell yourself, "I don't need to test this code, a normal user will never get to it;" you can be certain that after saying that, a user will find a way to break it. The Gods of Eternity will laugh at you.

Submission + - Law Lets I.R.S. Seize Accounts on Suspicion, No Crime Required

schwit1 writes: Theft by government: The IRS admits to seizing hundreds of thousands of dollars of private assets, without any proof of illegal activity, merely because there is a law that lets them do it.

Using a law designed to catch drug traffickers, racketeers and terrorists by tracking their cash, the government has gone after run-of-the-mill business owners and wage earners without so much as an allegation that they have committed serious crimes. The government can take the money without ever filing a criminal complaint, and the owners are left to prove they are innocent. Many give up and settle the case for a portion of their money. “They’re going after people who are really not criminals,” said David Smith, a former federal prosecutor who is now a forfeiture expert and lawyer in Virginia. “They’re middle-class citizens who have never had any trouble with the law.”

The article describes several specific cases, all of which are beyond egregious and are in fact entirely unconstitutional. The Bill of Rights is very clear about this: The federal government cannot take private property without just compensation.

Comment Re:It's more than that (Score 1) 158

Yeah, when people start talking about how great positive thinking is, I always think, "Sure, as long as things are going well."

Your mindset is, to some degree, a prediction of the future. For that prediction to be helpful, it needs to be fairly accurate. Now many people will point out that predictions can be self-fulfilling, and a positive expectation is more likely to lead to a positive outcome. It's true. But it can also leave you unprepared for a negative outcome.

I think positivity needs to be measured, constrained, and tempered by a realistic assessment. It's useful to consider the what happens if things don't go well, and prepare for things to go very badly. Perhaps more importantly, I think it's important for us all to understand that different people just seem to have different mindsets, different approaches, and different personalities. Whatever your mindset, it can be helpful to have someone around who is very positive, because they can help to keep us all motivated and moving forward. But it's also very useful to have a pessimist around, who will point out the problems with your plans, force you to confront some uncomfortable truths, and rain on your parade a little bit.

People of all kinds can be useful and valuable, so it's important to not shit all over pessimists all the time. As if they don't have enough to worry about, without y'all treating them like they're useless.

Comment Re:Perl-standard line length (Score 1) 169

In this case, a line is no longer than 255 characters. If you never used one of the early toy computers, you won't remember it, but each programming line was typically limited to a certain length.

And let's not even get started talking about line numbers.

Comment Re:One line? (Score 1) 169

You're no fun. If I worked for you, I'd quit as soon as possible.

Really, who couldn't love code like this:
0d=d:IFdVDUd:a=POINT(32*POS,31-VPOS<<5):RETURNELSEMODE9:GCOL-9:CLG:O FF:d=9:REPEATVDU30:REPEATGOSUBFALSE:IFPOS=28VDUPOS,15,VPOS,24;11,26:IF0E LSEIFa=0PRINT:UNTIL0ELSEUNTILVPOS=25:v=ABSRNDMOD7:i=0:VDU4895;3:REPEATm= 9-INKEY6MOD3:FORr=TRUETO1:t=rANDSGNt:IFt=rCOLOURv-15:VDUrEORm:i+=m=7AND9 -6*r:IF0ELSEFORn=0TO11:d=n/3OR2EORd:GOSUBFALSE:IF1<<(n+i)MOD12AND975AND& C2590EC/8^vVDU2080*ABSr;:t+=a:IF0ELSENEXT,:VDU20:UNTILt*LOGm:UNTILVPOS=3

Comment Re:And so therefor it follows and I quote (Score 1) 353

no, free as in beer, not as in speech.

What apple is doing is like giving away "free" beer to people who paid a lot of money to join a private beer drinking club. So its not "free" beer, its "no additional cost" beer.

Its also not Free as in speech either.

the major diffrence is the apple sells both the hardware and software, while microsoft just sells the software, and other companies sell the hardware.

So apple can say "well, the operating system part is complimentory with the purchase of hardware", and other PC makers cannot say this, because they don't own the software.

In fact, other PC makers want to do this, but instead of their own software, they want to give away Free as in speech software with hardware purchases.

Slashdot Top Deals

HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!

Working...