Comment Re:Ironic (Score 1) 298
If he wasn't at the park, how did the city prevent him from speaking?
The city can also pass laws regarding where you can post bills (notices, announcements, etc). Does that mean your free speech is violated?
If he wasn't at the park, how did the city prevent him from speaking?
The city can also pass laws regarding where you can post bills (notices, announcements, etc). Does that mean your free speech is violated?
Being an idiot is being an idiot, even on slashdot.
Labeling something as "trolling" has nothing to do with fear.
Nothing is stopping the (c)rapper from shouting at the top of his lungs wherever he happens to be.
Now the city will be prepared. They won't give a permit in the first place.
You all seem to be missing the point that he was not forbidden from speaking. Wherever he's hiding out, avoiding his responsibilities to his offspring, he can talk. He can perform. He can annoy passers-by until he reaches the level of public nuisance.
Free speech does not mean that the government must give a platform; it means that they can't remove you once you have found one.
Permits are granted on the expectation that the rules will be followed. If telecasted speech is considered an issue of free speech (which has not been demonstrated), then it is also considered speech such that it violates the terms of the permit. And don't tell me that a permit cannot prohibit free speech. It would have been perfectly legal for the permit to have been denied entirely, thus preventing the speech of every participant, and not just the (c)rapper evading arrest.
I suppose that responding to injustice by cutting your own leg off is a valid response, but don't blame us for thinking that you're just hurting yourself instead of dealing with the issue.
I don't know if (c)rap is the cause or the response to violence, but it certainly reinforces it. It makes it normal and expected. If that's how you want Black people to respond to negative outside influences, you're part of the problem.
The (c)rapper was free to spout his garbage in whatever locale he is hiding in. No one is stopping him from speaking. The local government is not required to provide a platform.
He was free to spout off in whatever location he found himself. The Constitution doesn't promise to provide a platform, which is what the organizers requested when they applied for a permit.
Really? Explain the presence of his post, if there is no free speech.
Overly-hyperbolic idiots, the lot of you.
The GP is one of those incredibly self-centered shit-faces who assume that if it's not relevant to them, it must not be relevant to anyone.
You could try leaving your bubble once in a while. In Israel, to give one example, LinkedIn is how you find a job when you don't have a personal network. Considering the number of immigrants coming each year, it's practically a necessity.
Are you stupid on purpose?
Your post doesn't raise any questions about your intelligence or ability to reason. It demonstrates that you don't have any.
And this is why OS X is great. Keychain is available system-wide, but apps can integrate access to it. Safari does this. It will generate random passwords if you want it to, and store them in your keychain.
Kleeneness is next to Godelness.