Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Why.... (Score 1) 191

This is exactly right. This what the Bart police did to protesters in 2011.

Obviously, the problem was not that the Bart police shot a protester in the back while he was handcuffed and lying face down (see video at 1:25). It was that too many people filmed the incident with their cell phone cameras and that not all the cell phones could be confiscated in time before the content could be uploaded to the internet.

By shutting down cell networks, you no longer have to worry about people streaming your actions on to the internet and you can just confiscate their device claiming that they contain evidence, and that they're just obstructing justice if they refuse to give their device to you.

Comment Re:Contact their Members and Complain (Score 1) 157

"The Internet Association represents America’s leading Internet companies and their global community of users." - Their members are companies that would hurt without Net Neutrality.

As the article originally posted points out.

Theran pointed to the role McCarthy played in advancing a key tech-industry priority: patent reform. Under McCarthy's floor leadership, the House passed the Innovation Act 325-91 in December 2013. Tech companies hope that the bill, which is designed to cut back on frivolous lawsuits from so-called "patent trolls," will soon pass the Senate.

Also, these other votes could of his have had an impact on their decision.

It is better to spend less than tax more. (Dec 2005)
Voted NO on extending AMT exemptions to avoid hitting middle-income. (Jun 2008)
Voted NO on paying for AMT relief by closing offshore business loopholes. (Dec 2007)
Taxpayer Protection Pledge: no new taxes. (Aug 2010)
No European-style VAT (value-added tax). (May 2010)
Supports the Taxpayer Protection Pledge. (Jan 2012)

Legislative transparency: post bills on Internet for a week. (Sep 2010)
Voted YES on protecting cyber security by sharing data with government. (Apr 2013)
Voted YES on terminating funding for National Public Radio. (Mar 2011)
Voted NO on delaying digital TV conversion by four months. (Mar 2009)
Voted YES on retroactive immunity for telecoms' warrantless surveillance. (Jun 2008)
Voted YES on $23B instead of $4.9B for waterway infrastructure. (Nov 2007)
Facilitate nationwide 2-1-1 phone line for human services. (Jan 2007)
Permanent ban on state & local taxation of Internet access. (Oct 2007)
Prohibit the return of the Fairness Doctrine. (Jan 2009)

Invested lottery winnings to start deli business at age 19. (Sep 2010)
Voted YES on workforce training by state block grants & industry partners. (Mar 2013)
Voted NO on letting shareholders vote on executive compensation. (Jul 2009)
Voted YES on more funding for nanotechnology R&D and commercialization. (Jul 2009)
Voted NO on allowing stockholder voting on executive compensation. (Apr 2007)
Repeal ObamaCare reporting requirements for small business. (Jan 2011)
Rated 14% by UFCW, indicating a pro-management voting record. (May 2012)

After all, if you're a CEO, which one is more important to you? net neutrality, or tax loopholes and your overall executive compensation package?

Comment Re:I guess all the Swiss watchmakers (Score 3, Insightful) 111

The Swiss still make mostly mechanical watches with loads of beautifully machined small moving parts. Those that want that kind of watch probably aren't even considering an electronic watch.

Swiss watches are fashion accessories. The Apple watch is a fashion accessory.

There is an overlap in market there.

Comment Re:It is Bullshit, IMO (Score 4, Insightful) 91

Back in the day when I was a pupil I had "library addiction" for several years. I spent most of my free time in the library reading books.

If you were reading books, that's completely different.

However, if you had been going to the library to stare at the same page of your year book day after day pining over a classmate you had a crush on, or going to the library only to hide behind a bookshelf staring at your crush while she's studying with her boyfriend, that would be a closer analogue to what people do on the internet nowadays.

Comment Re:This sounds familiar. (Score 1) 278

I was once part of an audio book venture that created a book reader app and and associated library application library that was specifically designed to be used by the blind and severely disabled. It actually met all its goals in regards to usability.

You must be from the future, because if there is a silver-bullet book reader solution for blind people, I certainly couldn't find one for my half-blind mother.

Currently, there is the audiobook reader provided for free by the Library of Congress. That reader is great in terms of physical interface design, but it's limited only to books that have had professional voice actors read them.

And then in terms of text-to-speech technology, the best technological solution out there is currently Ivona (now owned by Amazon), but despite all the awesome progress this technology has made over the years, it still isn't good enough for most blind users who want a book read to them for leisure.

So the company took it to the largest national organizations to get their seal of approval for it. The company was turned down by all of them because although application interface years ahead of any other application in regrades to the blind and severely disabled, their words, it did not accommodate the deaf. An audio book application that did not accommodate the deaf.

I'm not sure what you mean by "the largest national organizations" out there, and why you would even need their seal of approval in the first place, but if your venture was looking to get cash from them, or get some kind of exclusive endorsement from them, for what seemed like a commercial venture, it doesn't really matter the reason they gave you for that denial.

There is currently no perfect usable book reader for the blind. It doesn't really matter if the blind person is deaf, or not. For instance, my mother certainly wasn't deaf, and she certainly loved books, but there really wasn't a book reader solution that was satisfactory to her.

Comment Re:Not terrorism ? (Score 1) 308

>The FBI said they do not believe the incident is related to terrorism.

How can they know this so quickly ? I thought terrorist was a label for persons using violence for political motives.

Who said they were using violence? Trespassing doesn't imply violence. And they were the ones who got shot. They themselves didn't shoot anyone.

They could just have been a couple of well known protesters with no history of violence, but with an history of trying to do publicity stunts for their cause.

If anyone should know, it's the NSA. For about an hour, I bet every NSA analyst dropped what they were doing to investigate and go through the life records of these two individuals.

Comment Re:Don't make it impossible, just make it hard (Score 1) 385

Give me a break! This was only one incident.

Treating pilots like little kids who need someone to help every time they go to the bathroom is not a solution.

The extremely rare occurence of such an event doesn't justify the regular inconvenience and demeaning aspect of such a halfway measure.

Comment Re:"to provide support for the cultural sector" (Score 1) 237

That and they don't even realize they're barely capable of speaking in French -- they're illiterate in both offficial languages. I've known people from France who have to speak to people from Quebec in English because Quebecoise is such a mongrel of a language.

To be fair, it's the French language from France that is becoming a mongrel of a language.

I've never been to Québec, but aside from their annoying accent, the French-speaking people from Québec I've met seem to be using really old French.

Comment Re:Ubiquity is unavoidable (Score 3, Informative) 113

Even if the police make this data private, the general population will jump in to make this (and most) data such as this freely available.

Actually, there are private companies that already do this. They drive around streets and parking lots scanning people's license plates. Then they aggregate that information on a national level to resell to other companies. This data is really handy for car/truck repos, private detectives, and stalker exes.

And the information they have dwarves any information the police department has themselves. It's such a new area, it's not regulated yet.

Comment Re:Yet another makes the same mistake. (Score 2) 79

They are cutting themselves out of market reach by excluding consumers.

This portapotty-like shelter seems to have been optimized for government use. As far I can tell, it will tip over in extreme winds and it will suffocate its occupants in extreme heat. The last thing they want is the extremely bad reviews that might come from actual consumer adoption/experimentation before the government/Halliburton money comes in.

Slashdot Top Deals

One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.

Working...