Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:One thing to keep in mind... (Score 2) 244

The Head First books are a training introduction for complete novices. They were never designed as reference books, and in fact their back covers and introductions usually emphasize that point. I found the Head First books I bought very useful when I was new to a topic, and then useless afterwards - but that means they worked as intended.

Comment Re:Privacy? (Score 2) 776

Rural schools spend more on food assistance like free breakfasts, more on security - that gets expensive fast, and more on special needs children because poor people are more likely to have kids with untreated mental and physical disabilities. They also have a harder time attracting good teachers. It's heroic to teach the most disadvantaged children, but it's also hard to resist a classroom full of suburban brats whose parents give a damn about education. For poor kids, some have parents that are too stupid to care about education, and many have parents that care but are too busy working shit jobs to keep the kids fed to make sure they get to school and do their work. And higher local property taxes mean they need to pay the staff and teachers more for them to afford housing near the school.

Comment Re:Privacy? (Score 2) 776

The figures in that article are inaccurate for three reasons:

1. It includes money spent in post-high-school education. Our colleges and universities are insanely overpriced for what they deliver, and it is now an industry ripe for disruption. The liberal arts college I attended now costs $50,000 per year, it isn't anywhere near an Ivy League school. I don't know why any kids go there now. I wouldn't co-sign a loan for my own kids to go there. On spending through high school, our spending per student is much lower.
2. Standards of living matter. If a teacher making $50,000 per year in Iceland has a nicer home and car (or access to good public transit) than a teacher making $60,000 per year in the US, then Iceland can spend 17% less than the United States per employed teacher and still hire a higher quality of educator.
3. I suspect - but cannot prove - that US education costs from the study include the cost of providing health insurance to educators and other school staff, while most countries with nationalized health care budget those expenses separately. Even if the comparison does include health care costs from both countries, the US spends three times as much on health care per capita as most countries with nationalized health care. So that could account for the complete cost difference all by itself.

So... no, we're not overspending on education and wasting money. I'm sure there's plenty of corruption and waste to eliminate, and I support programs with that in mind. But it's dishonest to say we're just throwing good money after bad. We're not. We are not spending as much as the nations that are beating us in education.

Comment Re: I'll bite (Score 2) 265

You have the syntax memorized, but the problem is that the input flags for 'find' aren't the same as the ones for 'xargs' which in turn don't overlap with the ones for 'grep' or 'tar'. So that's four different sets of input flags you had to master. Congratulations on your skill. If you run into a text manipulation that's really complex, you have to use sed, awk, or Perl.

PowerShell has its warts, but the command flags are more uniform and its own help search is simpler. Complex text manipulation isn't as complex to implement because a.) you're working with objects and b.) you don't have to learn sed, awk, or Perl to get the job done.

I hate Microsoft's practices, their use of patents, and the windows registry among many other things. But it only benefits the open source community if we examine their tools closely and learn from them. Not everything they do is an inferior knock off of Unix practices.

Comment Re:This is why they reinvent the wheel (Score 4, Insightful) 626

I emphatically disagree with your reasoning.

1. Often times, you can't appreciate the existing solution until after you tried to make something better. An awful lot of the people who love Perl love it even more after they spent some time working with Python, Ruby, PHP, or for that matter Java, C#, or Haskell. If a kid - or an old fogey like us - wants to try to make the next Perl? Go for it.

2. Some times, you genuinely do make something that's an evolutionary step forward. What if, 30 years ago, people thinking like you convinced Larry Wall that C + sed + awk was good enough? It's rare, but it does happen.

3. The whole process of trying to understand what came before and trying to do better is an excellent learning method. If I write my own text editor, even if it's awful I'll probably become a better developer.

Now, basing a business model on trumping what came before is like gambling only more stupid. I wouldn't try to get rich inventing the next Perl, the next Facebook, or the next Docker. But trying to make one for fun.... why not?

Slashdot Top Deals

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...