Comment A behaviorist, it figures (Score 1) 270
that explains all the nasty shocks and having to press the mouse button repeatedly to get a random reward.
that explains all the nasty shocks and having to press the mouse button repeatedly to get a random reward.
your constitutional right to a trial. They make you agree to binding arbitration instead. (Section 10 of the EULA).
That one really burns me. It's pretty unAmerican to say "Give up a constitutional right or you can't use our product." (Was that there before?)
How can this be legal? There's got to be a way around that. I have no intentions of ever suing Microsoft, but this rubs me the wrong way. What's next, you have to give up your right to freedom of speech?
Um, no, the default is "Express Settings" which enables all that spyful telemetry by default. Most people are going to go with that. I turned it all off except for crash reporting.
Million, you must think this is 2001 in the Slashdot heydays...
I see you never begged at the feet of Silicon Graphics....
Sun on a throne? Sun were amateurs compared to SGI in making your customer kneel.
No sub $11,000 electric car that has 100 mile range.
No electric car that can charge in 6 hours at home without spending thousands on a fat charger and an electrician and permits to install it.
No apartments with electric charging stations.
So nope.
Only for Xbox one. Worthless.
now let me play games on my PC via my xbox one. Kerbal space program, dont starve, etc... Then it's competition.
Playing GTAV on my windows tablet? boring.
Startups BETTER think about it. Because sooner or later a real business may want to but the software or the startup. Then they need to learn real software development.
I know a guy who did do some iPhone apps. He said if you want to sell them you need to understand what people want, how to solve their problem, how to fix it when a bug is found, how to create documentation so users aren't badgering you with how-to questions, etc. If you want to do real software you will have to do all or most of what I listed.
What about requirements gathering? Business modeling? Testing? Versioning? Maintenance? Hosting? Building the app? Distributing the app.? Administering the build machines? Documentation? Communication and control of a project?
I'm sure I missed something. But there are a huge number of components to a reasonably sized software project. Programming is often the smallest, in numbers, slice of the task.
What do you call CEOs? They are ripping you off everyday.
Get better content, do better at troll control and get more of us to subscribe.
Why are you a cheap jerk and not paying a subscription? http://slashdot.org/subscribe....
not "Desperate affairs require desperate measures." ?
I saw it on the Reg.
What depresses me bout software is how often we JUST DO NOT LEARN! Yes I am shouting. I am frustrated by the situation. Software development seems to be riddled with arrogant know nothings who think they can cut corners or reinvent the wheel because doing the right way isn't "7337".
Software Development is not an Engineering discipline by any means, at best it is a craft, because the hard lessons are not explicitly taught to newbies who are not evaluated on how well they follow those practices and tests them on them as part of a core knowledge base. Which is how real Engineering disciplines do it.
That would require little timothy actually expend effort.
"Experience has proved that some people indeed know everything." -- Russell Baker