Comment Re:Not convincing at all (Score 1) 433
Indeed, someone meanwhile made the point about loudness wars and difference in mastering above. That makes total sense and wasn't something I knew before. I wish the article was about that.
Indeed, someone meanwhile made the point about loudness wars and difference in mastering above. That makes total sense and wasn't something I knew before. I wish the article was about that.
Audio is just a crazy world of snake oil and placebo.
Really, the argument that's supposed to convince us is this?
> That warm vinyl sound: "I think this is what people like about it: it pins very closely to the way that human beings hear music organically," Gonsalves said. "It's very mid-range-y and very warm," a sound that flatters the fuzzy guitars of rock 'n' roll.
I'm sorry but I just don't buy it. There seems to be no obvious reason why you couldn't easily hack up a digital audio filter that makes stuff "sound like a vinyl". I'd even wager that it already exists?
Especially when you skip the compression and use FLACs. (But no, I'm not that kind of person who would claim to be able to distnguish 320kbps mp3 from a FLAC.)
I don't really use side-by-side windows but I still like portrait mode - because I get to have enough room for sideways tabs!
Seriously, I don't get it why by default the browsers still ship the tab bar at the top. As soon as you have more than 6-10 tabs open, tab bar on the side becomes incredibly more convenient to work with.
Do you have any links discussing this more in depth? I took a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P... and that one is pretty brief and it's not remotely clear if it succeeded at these or not.
I don't know why are people looking at it as failure. We got plenty of data, we even got the very important chemical analysis data in the last session. It would have been great if it worked further, just as it was awesome that the Mars rover worked much longer than their projected mission lifetime was. But if that did not work out, we still got a lot of value out of this, so I don't follow why should it be a failure.
Vojtech brought me to SUSE Labs where I then worked on git and glibc for several years; since I did home office, we didn't meet that often but whenever we did, even because of something banal, it was a little awe inspiring for me. SUSE Labs is packed with brilliant people, but I always got the feel he's the smartest guy around. *And* at the same time it's a place that feels as un-corporate as possible in a corporation, I'm sure mostly thanks to his managing role.
So, I'm generally a bit sceptical about revering articles. But this one is spot on. When I think about it, I guess I still consider him one of my role models.
P.S.: Don't you guys feel kind of bored by the systemd spam under every Linux article too?
Based on Kant's imperative, I don't want to do myself what I wouldn't want others to do. I wouldn't want others to eat me (at least if it involved killing me first), so I wouldn't eat others either.
The question is, who are the "others" - in this context, clearly those that are also capable of guiding themselves by the Kant's imperative. Is any animal intelligent enough to make a choice based on this imperative? (I.e. it would willingly choose not to eat me based on observing me not eating its kindred.) I'm no expert on animal intelligence but I really doubt so.
Let's feast!
"Clearly not concerned about the AI's performance?"
It uses Python, indeed. And for the computationally intensive tasks, it uses numpy and theano. Theano is general symbolic computation framework that will automatically accelerate your vector computations on a nearby GPU, etc.
I don't know how it compares with (likely Lua, torch-based) deepmind's implementation. But assuming that scientific python programs actually do their expensive computations in the Python VM is really rather silly.
I'm sorry, I've meant to link to http://seclists.org/oss-sec/20... (you may want to walk the thread up a bit) and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh...
And now it turns out that even patched bash still carries some related security bugs. (Not really a surprise since the parser is complex and bound to, seems like running it on arbitrary environment variables really isn't the best idea...)
So, if you think you are safe,
export X='() { (a)=>\'
bash -c 'brm date'
cat brm
(N.B. the backslash is not inhibiting the apostrophe in shell syntax.)
That is, by crafter environment variables you can still overwrite files and run commands that were supposed to be parameters instead. This is still very dangerous, but thankfully the attack surface is smaller than before, for example $SSH_ORIGINAL_COMMAND is frequently not an issue anymore (at least in case of gitolite I couldn't *quickly* figure out a way to exploit this), etc.
No patch for this available yet.
Today is a fun day for linux! Think about switching your
On repo.or.cz, as login shell for all git user accounts we use a shell script that does some verifications, shows nice error messages etc. Thankfully, #!/bin/sh is at the top of the script and that's dash on the Debian server; otherwise, we would have been vulnerable. (Only getting into a chroot as non-root, but still...)
You can get shell on git@ accounts set up with gitolite and gitosis, at least some of their versions will use
ssh git@yourgitserver '() { echo $1; };
Because a desktop environment ties into a lot of the rest of the system infrastructure - from volume controls to disk mounting to power management - and the system infrastructure keeps moving forward. Therefore, you need to maintain the desktop environment in order for it to keep working well. A typical case is that xfce + new upower tends to suspend twice when you close the lid (i.e. when you open the notebook lid, it re-suspends right away). This is because noone updated xfce's power manager to a new upower API that was announced >6 months before it appeared in a release. (AFAIK xfce update finally happenned and is now fighting its way into Debian unstable.)
Desktop environment is not maintenance free. The rest of the infrastructure evolves (for real reasons - better hardware support, security fixes, usability,
Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson