The problem is, the powers that be over there decided to arbitrarily apply their “noteworthy” filter on everything, and so they’ve collapsed the infinite array of human knowledge down into a decidedly finite set of “relevant” human knowledge. Of course, they alone are the arbiters of what is and isn’t relevant, and wield the delete hammer often. Under these circumstances, yes you’ll eventually come to the end of what is “appropriate” for Wikipedia.
There’s another word for that. Starts with “c”, and ends with “ensorship”. I think they can ask China for it. ^^
"PS. The harshest measures so far were against US companies. Does Intel and Microsoft mean anything to you?"
Might this have something to do with the fact that US companies have different strategies and simply do not want to change their ways for the European market but do want the benefits of that same market? Said in a different way: if they don't like the European rules they could choose to not compete in the European market.
Anyway, The good news (to you) is, that ms Kroes is leaving office for another post real soon now. The bad news (to you), is that she's leaving it for the post of foreign trade, which deals with ict, e-commerce en telecom, among other things. I wouldn't count her out just yet. In Europe, things will get better, as far as I'm concerned. I'm quite certain that the wave of ever bigger companies because of 'economies of scale' were bad for society at large and I hope the trend will be reversed.
The new consoles started about $599
You mean the highest end PS3 retailed for $599. And it was endlessly ridiculed for being so expensive. The highest end 360 retailed for $399 at launch. $700 will hardly get you anything even close to being considered a higher end gaming rig.
No... I never said you had the freedom to force me to listen. I can walk away. If you insist on following me, I'll go to my private property (or someone else's private property that I know). If you still follow me after being asked to leave, you're trespassing.
Seems spam filters are basically putting up gates to my private property, in a very vague way.
And either way, I have every right to plug my ears and close my eyes while you try to sell me something. Freedom of speech doesn't imply you are guaranteed and audience
Just a month ago Greenbaum wrote an article and tweeted about hoaxes in the media. What motivates people to do them, etc.
Now, it sounds like all the details come straight from Greenbaum.
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving_a_vulgar_comment_online_might_cost_you_your_job.php#comment-169438 http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/leaving_a_vulgar_comment_online_might_cost_you_your_job.php#comment-169602
as a consumer, the market share of players makes no difference. what matters is choice. how many portables do you have to choose from if you want alac? ipod. how many players if you want flac? dozens, probably hundreds now.
anyway lossless makes the least sense in portables. lossless makes the most sense in distribution because encoding to some other format incurs no generation loss.
your advantages/disadvantages just don't match with the reality.
Nonetheless, I just rip all my music as
there are a couple of benefits (besides the free space): 1) flac is easier to tag in a way that is seen by all players; 2) if your wavs get corrupt, you might not know until you listen to them (maybe getting full-scale noise screaming out of your speakers), and the damage (rarely) could mess up the remainder of the file. with flac, each frame has a checksum and you can verify the whole thing. any errors damage only the frame, and can be detected and muted.
The biggest problem against FLAC is simple: relatively few portable media players support FLAC "out of the box." In fact, you almost would be better off with selling Apple Lossless encoded music, since just about every iPod classic, nano and touch model since 2004 and all iPhone models support Apple Lossless natively.
a lot more portables (by choice, not market share) support flac (dozens) than apple lossless (ipod)[1]. and pretty much everyone selling lossless is selling flac. as far as I know, nobody is selling apple lossless and the one outfit selling wma lossless (musicgiants) went bankrupt.
[1] http://flac.sourceforge.net/links.html (stale and missing a lot of new players and stores from this year)
Most media devices with music playback abilities do not have the function to play ogg (or flac for that matter).
nope, there are dozens of devices, including portables, that play vorbis, and dozens that play flac. flac is particularly cheap to decode. a partial list:
http://flac.sourceforge.net/links.html#hardware
http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/PortablePlayers
Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.