Comment Re:Update to Godwin's law? (Score 0) 575
Karma whoring is the requisite corollary for non-anonymous trolling.
Karma whoring is the requisite corollary for non-anonymous trolling.
It's a LANoT.
No, 1:16:9. Our entire solar system moved to high-def monoliths shortly after 2001.
But local reception really degraded...
Leave it to motherfucking Jeremiah Cornelius, whose opinions are so fucking important that he just has to barge his fat ass to the front of the line to reply to the post which will get him closest to the top, no matter whether that post has anything to do with what he wishes to say.
What an asshole.
Dankeshon!
Thanks for living in the past.
First he urged their selflessness and humility - then in the second case? He exhibited his own.
You are noble. In the best and most approving sense of the word.
There are people who haven't faced a fraction of your difficulty, who are yet to perform the level of introspection you've mustered to understand how they behave - and to derive from it a mission or a wish.
"but it is possible to be happy and depressed, the thoughts are not mutually exclusive."
Yes. Happiness is a real trip.
I don't know if we'd get along together in "real life" - but around this ASCII-space, I'm one of your real fans and supporters. And I'm glad to be.
"I've learned that people will forget what you said, people will forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made them feel."
-- Maya Angelou
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Those who fail to understand history are doomed to repeat it....even if they have to force it down our throats.
Holder doesn't fail to understand it - he and his ilk are back for Round 2. They will persist until the liberty is removed, however many rounds that takes. Then they will move on to the next liberty that still stands. If they can't win at the Federal level, they will get it done at the State level (e.g. California's back door requirements for cell phones).
That's how government works; I guess your point is well-supported by the history after all.
billionaire computer science major Judith Faulkner
What? Who says things like that? Is there even any semantic meaning in context of the issue? </aside>
My understanding, especially from friends still-on-the-inside (of clinical information systems), is that EPIC's main product is a SEP field.
I used to work on what was once hailed as a model clinical information system, but it was killed by beancounter CIO-types, angling for bonuses on unspent budgets, and eventually they were replaced by the clinicians who just wanted something where they felt they could get features and reliability (internal requests for such were almost always turned down by management because of perverse incentives).
Not being qualified to make technical decisions, [as I understand it] the clinicians went for big & popular, as it was felt that at least that stood a good chance of being decent. But more importantly, the internal bureaucrats were always angling for budgets and lawyers while the outside vendor is able to offer relief from all of that for merely a mountain of money. Clinical functionality is somewhere down the list in terms of required features.
Something like Metropolis?
Metropolis was all about the imagery. No matter how good this Tetris movie is or is not, it'll all be about the fifteen minutes before - filling the theatre seats is going to be great fun!
Can you provide citations for this?
Everybody knows that if you grow most of your own food on a 1/4 acre of yard, it's much worse for the environment than if you hire a company to maintain a pristine lawn there and drive down to the Whole Foods in your SUV to buy produce flown in from Chile.
nature is so much worth than farming.
So stop eating farmed food. Or stop being a hypocrite - either would be acceptable.
Obvious downside: fossil fuel use to get water where it is most useful may exacerbate the problem over time.
We know just fine how to build nuclear-powered ocean vessels. Maybe Congress can give the corporate welfare to the MIC to build iceberg haulers instead of battleships.
Since we're on the subject, does anybody know how to calculate the centripetal and gravity effects of a long-range tunnel bored through the earth's crust? I suspect there must be a maximum achievable tunnel length but also maybe the rotation of the Earth could be used for pumping energy, depending on direction.
It might just be easier, though, to warm to environment and have some of Antartica melt again, and re-humidify the atmosphere. People cannot seem to wrap their heads around the ice sheets, but if you told them there was a hole bigger than the United States filled with 500 feet of fresh water that was locked away from the atmosphere - that they could get. Even fewer can understand that the oceans have risen 120m in the past 20,000 years - geologists aren't welcome in the mainstream (pundits won't even accept those graphs in the IPCC reports).
All the water that used to be in the Aral Sea, had to go somewhere. Today it is in the oceans, raising global sea levels by several millimeters.
I can see not reading the article, it is Slashdot, but to jump to comment before even the second paragraph of the summary
eh, the NFL will probably just headbutt the FCC in the bridge of the nose during a 'roid rage and forget about it next week.
"No matter where you go, there you are..." -- Buckaroo Banzai