Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Apple

Steve Jobs Crowned "Person of the Decade" 346

longacre writes "Apple CEO Steve Jobs won over 30% of the vote in an online poll published by personal finance and investing news site SmartMoney.com, enough to earn their 'Person of the Decade' title by a solid margin over luminaries such as Warren Buffett (17%), Ben Bernanke (13%) and Google founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page (12%). From the article: 'Certainly, Jobs accomplished more than probably any other CEO since he returned to Apple in the late 1990s: Not only did he revive sales at the failing computer company, he led the stock to a more than 700% increase in value, and forever changed the way people buy and listen to music.'"

Comment Re:TPMs and related tech (Score 1) 84

Hardware can be made secure by making it tamper-resistant. Cryptographic ICs can be rigged to self-destruct when somebody opens the package.

Sometimes you don't even need to expose the silicon to mess with the guts of a chip. You can still connect to the pins or solder pads of an IC and monitor signals passively, or introduce overvoltage/undervoltage/weird signal patterns from outside.

Comment Re:It's a security issue (Score 2, Insightful) 84

...and how many people in the security community started out in the hacker community and took great pains to conceal their real names back then? More to the point, how many people in the security community go to great lengths to dissociate their all-grown-up-now professional lives from their days in the hacker scene because it would call unfavorable attention upon their employers, plus put certain of their expensive certifications in jeopardy?

Some people spend years hacking around in their basements and don't feel a need to tell anyone about their work. Others "suddenly appear" because they finally feel like publishing something, the work they publish is brilliant, and thus they gain respect for it.

Comment Re:It's time to be serious when your gov. is at ri (Score 1) 229

That's an easy thing to say. Coming up with a set of changes to push for is a little more difficult, and actually getting enough people to push in order to make a difference is harder still.

It is an easy thing to say, yes. It's also what I usually tell people who complain and complain about the way things are going but can't be bothered to vote, let alone call or write their congesscritter or representative to voice their complaints.

Incidentally, that you linked to actionable bills and social action for them marks you as not one of those people, which I find quite surprising, and refreshing. There are too many like that, these days.

What do you suggest are some good first steps?

What I suggest, and in fact practice myself is to compile lists of your representatives in government and keep in touch with them. Ostensibly, they are supposed to represent the will of the people, but if they don't know the will of the people they'll do their own thing. "Hi, I'm your constituent, these are the things important to me.. [list and reasons here]... If you listen to me and vote in such a way that you represent my interests I'll not only vote for your re-election but I'll contribute money, otherwise [name of other candidate here] would be more amenable to doing so and my vote and money will go to them. My tax dollars pay your salary." I've found over the years that by bringing up the next election and the prospect of campaign donations makes it more likely that I'll get more than a canned reply when I do try to get in touch with them about something. Work all the angles you can.

Someone mentioned instant runoff voting, but I think that's jumping the gun--it (along with any other alternative to the current system) gives third parties a stronger voice, so you'll have a hard time convincing current politicians to back it.

Yeah, that would shake things up a lot. Given that some third-party candidates were unusually visible in the '04 election (which made a lot of people inside the Beltway nervous) that seems like a significant risk to the power bloc of the big two.

In my opinion, the best way to foster change is to spread the word about a few bills being sponsored by Downsize DC...

I've deleted your suggestions for the sake of brevity, but I will certainly look over the Downsize DC website and the bills you referenced. I wasn't aware of this before and I'll do some research on it. Offhand it seems potentially helpful.

Either one of these two measures by itself would do a lot to improve the quality of legislation coming out of Washington. DownsizeDC has a decent system for sending messages to all your congressmen. Their newsletter often has interesting (read: maddening) tidbits about what's going on in Washington, too, though the rhetoric can be juvenile at times.

Again, thank you for the heads-up. I've added it to my daily news crawl.

If you want to make a difference, start pushing for these bills. They have a lot of support already, and every new call for them makes it more likely that they'll actually be passed. Don't be put off because the organization doesn't support something that you do (the health care bill, for instance)--just make use of their system to keep increasing pressure on Congress to pass important legislation like the proposals listed above.

No organization will support everything that everyone wants or believes in. The only thing we can do is support those that seem to back most of them and speak out on the specifics.

Comment Re:It's time to be serious when your gov. is at ri (Score 2, Insightful) 229

Perhaps the reason we are so blase about it is what little we can actually do about the problem.

The two party system ensures that corruption comes in a cartel of two.

And that is why you fail. If you don't think anything can change and never bother to try, nothing will.

Slashdot Top Deals

Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker

Working...