Comment Re:What a Troll! (Score 1) 395
No, but they do move to save on labor costs (including worker safety), environmental regulations, and consumer product regulations. Or maybe you're right, it's all about the taxes.
No, but they do move to save on labor costs (including worker safety), environmental regulations, and consumer product regulations. Or maybe you're right, it's all about the taxes.
Just look at Office 2007. Word looks and behaves nothing like Outlook or OneNote. In Windows, the big players tend to have fairly good interfaces, but as soon as you move away from the over-$100 realm of Windows software, you're in amateur land and the interfaces quickly devolve into a case study in worst practices. I find that I much prefer using ported Gnome software in Windows than many native solutions. Yes, Photoshop is a fantastic program, but I'd take GIMP over ArcSoft abominations any day of the week. At least I don't have to pay for GIMP.
This article should really be titled "Why Users Drop Cheaper Programs for More Expensive Ones". At least the open source solutions generally resist the urge to insert ads into their software and use a bunch of proprietary widgets.
In Vista you can tag Microsoft Office documents, but that is all. The files I use most, PDFs, are not taggable. Nor are text files, or open office files, or anything else for that matter. You can search, but the interface isn't great.
...I haven't touched Pocket IE in a very long time.
Neither has Microsoft.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion