Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Submission Summary: 0 pending, 34 declined, 15 accepted (49 total, 30.61% accepted)

×
The Courts

Submission + - Public buildings don't get intellectual protection (nytimes.com)

TuringTest writes: Spanish architect Santiago Calatrava, of international fame, recently sued the city of Bilbao (Spain) for violation of intellectual property after his Zubizuri bridge was modified by the city council to add a new footbridge on its side. Now a judge has sentenced against Calatrava saying that public right prevails over intellectual property. Altough the ruling acknowledges that the building design has intellectual property, it also concludes that a bridge is to walk on it. (Beware, some links are in Spanish. Translate at your own risk.)
Microsoft

Submission + - Microsoft licenses Office GUI specifications

TuringTest writes: Jensen Harris, the Group Program Manager of the Microsoft Office User Experience Team, blogs about Microsoft's recent licensing agreement to share its new inteface IP: "Today, we're announcing a licensing program for the 2007 Microsoft Office system user interface which allows virtually anyone to obtain a royalty-free license to use the new Office UI in a software product, including the Ribbon, galleries, the Mini Toolbar, and the rest of the user interface." (see the press release). Is there any precedent for this? Can Microsoft actually require licensing of the UI? Is it enforceable? Is this a good precedent?

Slashdot Top Deals

HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!

Working...