No better proof of Betteridge's law.

"proper safeguards" == cuts into profits.
A fatal flaw with nuclear power, too.

honestly, what do you expect of a 100EUR / week hotel room?

Surely the enter the EU there are certain prerequisites that need to be met. Such as :
1. retirement age properly in line with demographics
2. transparent and mostly non-corrupt government
3. mostly fair and enforced tax system
4. reasonable spending on military

The Japanese figured out all the algorithm you need to drive in Boston way back in the 60's.

no no no no No NO NO!

They got the headline wrong, should read : ROBOT ATTACKS PROSTATE of MAN TRAPPED in MRI with NEEDLES

I'm sure the younger generation will accept this as a beneficial advancement and not some of the scariest parts of the major motion picture "Prometheus".

IT'S HAPPENING!

We'd all be safe from this calamity if the traitor John Snowden hadn't sold our country's secrets to the Soviets.

Yo dog, I heard you like backdoors. So I backdoored your backdoor so you can get p0wned while you p0wn!

As the Bataman said, "the world only makes sense when we force it to".
That's why we all morally obligated to track down evildoers and punch them in the balls. I'm pretty sure Thomas Jefferson wrote that, somewhere.

ixnay on the pluterday talk, you'll get the 1%'s whining about class warfare again.

Long-distance electrodes shot into the pinion pituitary glands of recent dead.

wait, I thought that was one of the bells and whistles they were flogging with this.
So why does the pilot need to turn his head to see behind the plane? He shouldn't even need to set down his beer.

Although you can make a bong from an old toner cartridge, it's probably not a good idea.

If the current owner was actually using the name for his business, I'd agree with the majority of commenters in this thread. Say he had a consulting firm named "WorkBetter, Inc." and had been using it for years with business cards, receipts, and tax records to show for it. That does not appear to be the case here, as he has a list of domains that he's trying to sell. 117 of them by my count, including several with active trademarks and a few Daft Punk-ish variants of work-something.

This is textbook cybersquatting. He bought a whole bunch on speculation hoping to get rich quick, and now wants to cash in his lottery ticket. It's a little too late for him to claim he has a legitimate business use for it.

I know that's not the prevailing opinion here, but he's been squatting on the domain for years without using it. I think the company suing him has a legitimate case. It doesn't and shouldn't matter that he held the domain before the plaintiff registered their trademark; his continued holding of it is squatting.