Yeah, I don't get that. I absolutely love my Pre. And to answer your question, Exchange syncing works great.
In most (all?) states the camera has to show that the light was red before you entered the intersection. Two pictures are taken - one of you outside the intersection with a red light and one of you in the intersection with the red light.
Oh, and the citations in Maryland include your speed. Can't speak for any other states.
It's because Intel dominates the high end. AMD can't sell a processor with a premium pricetag because its performance would compete with Intel's midrange which is priced pretty reasonably.
AMD is the loveable underdog, but don't forget how expensive their X2s were when they were dominant. AMD isn't cheap because they're doing us a favor, they're cheap because they have to be.
I can't confirm his claim that the total number of accidents increases, but studies have noted that rear end accidents go up even as the t-bone accidents go down with the cameras.
Poorly written net neutrality legislation could cause problems and reduce service quality.
For example, Akamai could work out a deal so that Comcast could cache Akamai's most popular content close to the end user. This requires less internet bandwidth and so Comcast could deliver the content to their users at a faster rate (a higher tier).
Poorly written net neutrality legislation could stop this from happening.
This is why there is some push back on net neutrality. If the legislation is screwed up, QoS and local caching that benefits the end user could end up inadvertently outlawed.
I'm quite conservative and I enjoy listening to Limbaugh. I find him incredibly entertaining whether or not I agree with him.
The aggravating thing with this is that now there are going to be 100 stories on sites like Digg proclaiming him and the entire conservative movement frauds simple because of the misstatement.
Fair enough. I've read your journal long enough to know how carefully you parse words, so I immediately focused on his choice of words:
"We believe that the preamble of the Constitution contains..."
I'm embarrassed to admit that I had to look it up to verify my assumption.
He disagrees with the assertion that it is in the preamble to the constitution.
Quite simply, it's not there. Look it up.
Last I heard, the clock speed was too low for it to be competitive with the different forms of DDR. DDR simply scales better. And lets face it - DDR/2/3 has been more than adequate to keep CPUs fed with data.
Actually, I had to look that up recently. It's not 3GB, it's 4GB. Here comes the science:
RAM starts from address 0. The BIOS allocates RAM from 0 up to the bottom of the PCI memory addresses mentioned above, typically limiting available RAM to between 3 GB and 3.4 GB."
I actually learned something last week, thought I'd pass it on...
*Cue the "The More You Know" logo*
Looks like you ended up arguing his point. 32-bit Vista/XP are limited to a little over 3GB. How much over 3GB is determined by your hardware.
Factorials were someone's attempt to make math LOOK exciting.