Comment Re:How 'bout.. (Score 1) 212
I would expect nothing less at intelligence agencies.
That's cute. You believe government with no oversight is competent?
I would expect nothing less at intelligence agencies.
That's cute. You believe government with no oversight is competent?
Most geeks would make excellent mechanics
yeah but this would become actual reality
"Would you want a car that would crash twice a day for no reason?"
I would place much more trust in a car enthusiast than a minimum wage greasemonkey
I can fully agree with this statement. However it's not the point I was making. What about someone worse than a minimum wage greasemonkey....like me? Perfectly legal today....
home-built cars are exempt from most (if not all) of it.
Is there a source for this? I know things like ultra-light aircraft have very low regulatory hurdles, but cars on the open road? I thought there were minimums in place that get stricter every year. Like how all new cars need a tire pressure monitoring system?
Genuinely curious
the staff of the NSA does not have carte blanche to just spy on people
They had to create an entire CATEGORY of spying called LOVEINT because so many of them were spying on their spouses, partners or potential dates. While the semantics over what was 'authorized' can be debated, that large numbers of agency personnel had access to the data to troll at their leisure without fear of reprisal still hasn't been refuted.
If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.