Some people do see the justice system as a method for taking revenge
How people see it is likewise irrelevant. It's put in place expressly to prevent 'revenge' from being the method of retribution.
Again, changing the punishment to life incarceration doesn't make the problem go away.
Given that we've just found out that the FBI has screwed up 1000s of cases including 30+ who are now dead and perhaps wouldn't be...life is infinitely better.
No, the person's life is just as wasted
That tells us plenty about your opinion...I'd wager most people on death row would see it slightly differently. And 100% of those now dead would see it differently. Being 'free' for even an hour is still probably worth, quite seriously, millions of dollars to those people (and the local populace who gets to pay it)
If they remain a threat, just eliminate said threat.
Worked well when fighting the mythical Lernaean Hydra...unless of course you've discovered the modern equivalent of torching the stumps after every each head is cut off; we seem to be missing that part of the story currently.
Drone strikes make MORE terrorists not less.
don't rely on electricity as their power source
Why wouldn't we use the single most abundant energy source on the planet to power something that is energy intensive? Oh and said energy source has no fuel costs?
No, freedom implies rule of law.
The Internet has been fine up to now without FCC intervention.
So it's not 'free' then right? There aren't laws governing the behavior of the ISPs so it can't be free.
'Freedom' is the express lack of restrictions, i.e. 'freedom of movement'. 'rule of law' specifically limits what is allowed and/or acceptable to society for the benefit of said society.
FCC regulation of UTILITIES is a restriction of the utility operator's activity for the benefit of society. You don't have 4 water systems in your town, you don't have 4 electric grids. Why should we have to have 4 sets of internet infrastructure to have competition?
ISPs, through franchising, have become defacto monopolies in entire areas and are behaving as such. Unless you build entirely separate infrastructure (i.e. 4 water systems) there is no competition and thus no free market. That is ALL the FCC is enforcing here - as a defacto monopoly you can't favor or disfavor traffic on your infrastructure.
It's impossible to 100% fully implement any ideology, but looking on a scale, economically free countries, almost uniformly, are more prosperous.
Economies that balance free market with regulations are the ones that do the best.
Full scale anarchy is the only truly 'free' market. I.e. whatever I want to do is justified since I want to do it.
Too many libertarians and other supposedly 'free market' proponents conveniently forget the role regulations play in creating a level playing field...like net neutrality.
Where there's a will, there's a relative.